Canon XSI 1111 Responses

Last post: 7 months ago | Thread started: Jan 26, 08, 11:13 a.m.

RespondNew TopicDisable Images

• sikma

  No sample images yet but the rumored street price is around $900.

  I know its not considered a pro body but christ thats cheap for 12mp!

  Jan 26, 08, 11:13 a.m. – Permalink

• sikma

  http://www.dpreview.com/news/080…

  

  You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

  Cancel

  Dog-earJan 26, 08, 11:13 a.m. – Permalink

• ok_not_ok

  Check this out.

  http://cweb.canon.jp/camera/eosd…

  not mind blowing...IMHO

  

  You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

  Cancel

  Dog-earJan 26, 08, 1:37 p.m. – Permalink

• colin_s

  "meh"

  

  You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

  Cancel

  Dog-earJan 26, 08, 1:56 p.m. – Permalink

• sikma

  agreed - those sample images were surprisingly noisy.

  

  You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

  Cancel

  Dog-earJan 26, 08, 2:35 p.m. – Permalink

• TheTofuFactory

  check out the Samsung DSLR coming out shortly. Its really nice and judging by their recent production of entertainment and prosumer / consumer products, its promising.

  • they're rebadged Pentaxs (or maybe jointly developed is more accurate). great value in the Pentax line.– monNom

  

  You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

  Cancel

  Dog-earJan 26, 08, 3 p.m. – Permalink

• pr2

  small penis envy, u got? u can get totaly pro images with anything. 8mp or 12... doesn't really matter.

  

  You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

  Cancel

  Dog-earJan 26, 08, 3:55 p.m. – Permalink

• colin_s

  no, you can't. the 12 mp doesn't matter when your sensor can't pick up minute shades of grey or color within the darks. the rebel sensor is and always has been a joke. the noise is unbelievable.

  one of these days consumers will realize that after 10 mp, size becomes less a factor and quality moreso. shooting on an ISO above 400 on the rebel is guaranteed to have crappy image quality, especially in moderate light or below.

  

  You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

  Cancel

  Dog-earJan 26, 08, 5:21 p.m. – Permalink

• kalkal

  Above 400? No, thats a bit harsh, although from what I see, 800 is the highest I'd be happy to use...

  

  You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

  Cancel

  Dog-earJan 26, 08, 7:17 p.m. – Permalink

• colin_s

  yeah but the noise level at 400 on the rebel is that at about 1600 on the 40-d. the 5-d at 1600 is about that of 200 on the rebel.

  quality chips > megapixel count.

  

  You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

  Cancel

  Dog-earJan 26, 08, 8:24 p.m. – Permalink

• lvl_13

  megapixels don't really mean shit as colin said.

  it's a way to hype a camera...to push the latest/greatest with more megapixels...but i am wasting my breathe with you all, because most of you already know this :)

  

  You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

  Cancel

  Dog-earJan 26, 08, 11:28 p.m. – Permalink

• jaylarson

  more megapixels is fine, as long as the pixels are bigger too. otherwise you are crammin' too many into a small size thereby often degrading the image quality with noise and ca.

  

  You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

  Cancel

  Dog-earJan 27, 08, 1:54 a.m. – Permalink