Site crit!
- Started
- Last post
- 32 Responses
- non0
Nice job. The only thing I would reconsider is the logo animations. I tend to find them a bit "cheesy", but thats just my personal opinion. I know that clients sure like it when their logo "does cool stuff".
Again, very smooth, simple andesthetically pleasing website.
- schjetne0
scrollwheel?
- version30
it slides, it's gray, it's not overbearing.
i likes
(used a similar nav on a client site few years ago)
- ian0
Hey there,
Sorry for not responding, was off photographising the last of the images for the projects for this thing.Listen, thanks all for the very constructive criticism of the site, notes have been made and Im working on tweaking it now.
Thanks! Oh and PonyBoy, if yer out there, thanks for all the help cochise!
- Jaline0
I agree with para about starting with the most recent work first and then moving back towards 1987.
Also, the big "talent" text at the bottom of the "our people" page is overlapped by the text box above it, but this is a minor thing. I was just looking at it in terms of continuity, and how the rest of the pages don't touch the text at the bottom (except the "our promise" page, but that overlapping is even more minor).
Overall though this is a very good job :)
Love the simplicity.
- wendog0
runs a bit slow on my Intel Mac Pro (2 x 2.66 Ghz Dual Core, 4 GB 667 DDR2 memory)
:/
- ian000
i like it! some of thee logo animations seem a little forced though. i might opt too not animate the weaker ones
- rson0
Looks great. One think why is your archived work under "Our Promise" seems like it should be under "Our Work"
- Nairn0
a little more color wouldn't hurt.
_salisae_
(Jun 12 07, 06:23)Mmm.. I prefer it when Navs are truly distinct from text content.
At the very least, it should be consistent across site - in 'Our Clients' you use magenta text for nav... but nowhere else?
- Dancer0
Kicking OSx.4.9
876MHz
Gig 'o' Ram
Safari 2.04I need a new mac but yeah slow and clunky here
- _salisae_0
looks well-thought out and i like the type work. a little more color wouldn't hurt. i would prefer to see the current work with the option to reach back to 1987.
i love the castleyard logo!
great job!
- material-10
kerning on the image numbers(1 of 6, etc) is pretty bad
- skt0
SOme nice work in there, and i like the overall look of the site. but the whole site scroll between sections can be a little clunky and unessecary imo. I would look at a new way to move between sections.
also, in your work section, i can make it break by jumping too quickly between items.
nice enough though.
- abba_cadaver0
Nothing happens when I click on the Parc, iACT and IWA in the work section.
Other that that everything looks great over here
I'm on firefox 2.0
- digilee0
Personally, i don't dislike it.
To me it looks like a lot of other sites.
Not the same, as in rip, but similar.Do you really need the 'our promise' bit? I hate that.
Are you going to promise to do shit work and rip me off? Of course not!from 'uurgghh' to 'hhhmmm' I'd give it a 'nnnnn ... it's ok'.
- Nairn0
No, timeline is indeed wrong. Tell your boss that Para and Nairn insist he change it to the KORREKT way around.
- Nairn0
Neat, petite. I like.
Would be nice if you had some clever interactivity on the timeline - those wee left/right buttons aren a bit fiddly.
Indentation on address in contact section doesn't look right and the map - would that be useful to people coming from outside of Dublin?
- ian0
Hey Dancer,
Ta for the feedback, checked it in safari but worked ok, not slow and jerky. So dunno, what was bad for you?Also talked to my boss about the whole timeline thing and he says its fine as is, so me thinks that could be the last word on that :(
- Dancer0
Diffinately what para said. I went straight to '06.
Also runs like a bitch in Safari, but hey that's Safari for you :/
- schjetne0
Looking good! Shouldn't be to hard to make my mouse scroll wheel work on the news box though...