feminist?
- Started
- Last post
- 682 Responses
- georgesIII0
Why was he forced into this humiliation? Because he was subjected to an unrelenting tweetstorm of abuse. He was bombarded across the internet with a hurtling dustcloud of hate, orchestrated by lobby groups and politically correct media organizations. And so I want, naturally, to defend this blameless man. And as for all those who have monstered him and convicted him in the kangaroo court of the web – they should all be ashamed of themselves. Yes, I suppose some might say that his Hawaii shirt was a bit garish, a bit of an eyeful. But the man is not a priest, for heaven’s sake. He is a space scientist with a fine collection of tattoos, and if you are an extrovert space scientist, that is the kind of shirt that you are allowed to wear.
- paraselene0
what the fuck was all this about?
soda
(Mar 17 06, 03:19)why the fuck are you fucking intent on saying fuck today soda?
determinedmoth
(Mar 17 06, 03:25)soda is waging a continual battle to maintain his street cred since moving to crouch end.
*cough
- set0
Snowoman
- soda0
Prev Respond
what the fuck was all this about?
soda
(Mar 17 06, 03:19)why the fuck are you fucking intent on saying fuck today soda?
determinedmoth
(Mar 17 06, 03:25)soda is waging a continual battle to maintain his street cred since moving to crouch end.
*cough
paraselene
(Mar 17 06, 03:30)fuckers.
- paraselene0
soda, honey, you know that i am in no position to fucking criticise you at all, living as i do in fucking east dulwich for fuck's sake.
*turns cap sideways
- kelpie0
well fuck the both of you, though I am neither a jew nor a rangers player, I love my fucking mansion in Newton Mearns.
I love the fact that means nothing to you.
- set0
The boogie woman
- i_monk0
Arya has no time for Hermione's first-world feminism:
- sofas1
Hermesmann v. Seyer
"Hermesmann v. Seyer (State ex rel. Hermesmann v. Seyer 847 P.2d 1273 (Kan. 1993)) was a precedent-setting Kansas, United States case in which Colleen Hermesmann successfully argued that a woman is entitled to sue the father of her child for child support even if conception occurred as a result of a criminal act committed by the woman.[1][2] The case was brought in her name by the then Kansas Department of Social and Rehabilitation Services."
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/He…
For more general info on Female-on-male rape:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ra…
- set0
Yeswoman
- Ianbolton0
not many posts in here for a good few years. Does that mean it's sorted and the patriarchy has been demolished?
Apparently not, now Peterson is back doing his thug-life shit.
https://medium.com/the-no%C3%B6s…
- GeorgesII0
this is why I can't argue with feminist,
as a married family man with a young child it irritates me when I get compared to a rape apologist, victim blaming, isis lover or other silly demeaning tactics sjw feminist use to make themselves seem superiors,honestly who here said women should be treated as second rate citizen, we are just pointing some basic flaws in the feminist movement (2nd, 3rd wave) which for me is pure bullshit and almost as egalitarian as hitler was to the jews (you see I can play this silly association game too)
now if you were normal adults you could actually debate this subject without ad hominems, but in so far, we are pro apartheid, we hate womyn and are hell bent into sending modern women back to the kitchen where they will be treated worst than jews during the holocaust (oops, I did it again, silly me)
"I thought those of us in the western world were beyond the need to control or have power over a woman. I guess this is the thread that highlights our links to ISIS and such where they believe women should not have the same equal rights and such as us men"
when you read this, does it even sound like something a rational adult would say?