Paying $200...
- Started
- Last post
- 155 Responses
- tfsmag0
have you seen his kids? he needs that much money to fix them up to be presentable hahaha
- tfsmag0
why can't the rest of the 200$ + pants buyers in the thread just be honest like scarabin and admit you buy them for the "brand association" and "teh hoes" instead of trying to come up with some other sort of justification. sheesh
- meok0
..because I never bought anything that has a brand showing.
..because I've been in the fashion biz long enuff the appreciate the craftmanship and the quality of certain fabrics.
..because I like to match an expensive pair of jeans with a 10$ blank tee, dirty smelly shoe and a questionable haircut.
---But at the end tfsmag, youre right tho. Its for the BITCHES AND HOES! hehe
- skinnyboy0
I fooking hate those worn in, vintage bollocks jeans that everyone wears and pays loadsa cash for. Its harder to find a normal pair in the shops. The birds like a good pair of shoes anywayz.
- lowimpakt0
my girlfriend prefers me when I wear no pants. and that's free
- fate0
lol lowimpakt
- Rand0
why does almost everybody wear jeans, even though almost everybody looks like shit in them?
- jpolk0
"my artist friends, is that their artistic vision doesn't stop at the canvas, it carries over to every part of their life."
haha - you stupit!
- tfsmag0
hahahah jpolk
that was my reaction too, but i'm nicer than you :P
- shaft0
I can understand spending $400 on quality trousers. $400 jeans however, will make you the sharpest looking folk in the whooole village. Make sure they go with zircon-incrusted cowboy boots, nobody can beat the combination! :]
- shaft0
Cuz I like you
Yeah I like you
And I feel so Bohemian like you
- puter0
never paid more than $40 for a pair of Jeans (my whole life)- most came from a thift store at $4.00 to $12.00 a pair and never had a problem getting pussy...
You guys are fuckin hilarious thinking $400 jeans gets you booty. Most chicks wouldn't go near a dweb who wastes money on such stupid shit.
- ad10
- Meeklo0
"i'm saying is that as an artistic person, and what i've seen in my artist friends, is that their artistic vision doesn't stop at the canvas, it carries over to every part of their life."
So you are saying, that an artist is a person who wears $400 jeans, but a person that wears $40 is not.
Am I the only one seeing the big picture here?
It's all good man, it's your money, you spend it the way you like, Im not here to tell you how you dress.
Your justifications doesn't make any sense. Paying that kind of money for a pair of jeans doesn't make you an artist.
- heathen0
i wear the shit outta my jeans, so i can justify paying a little more than the $30 i would at, say the mall. you are paying for the quality of the fabric and cut. plus, i like a more flattering cut than the three traditionally offered to men: baggy, straight leg, or relaxed.
but, i would probably kick my own ass if i was wearing $400 jeans!
- sean_TNMC0
I got some EVISU jeans they are worth $350 canadian...My mom threw a hook at me when she found out how much i bought them for....
- Jie_P0
1. I would never pay $400 for a pair of jeans.
2. If i did, i wouldn't tell anybody.
adios
- monkeyshine0
oh come on...just admit you're a brand whore. Nothing wrong with it. Everybody uses different things to boost their self confidence.
...silliest thread of the day award.
- DutchBoy0
"so are all you guys whining about the expense of brand named clothes using gimp on linux?"
good point!
- greg0
the most I've spent on jeans is $40 ... You can't beat Levi's 517