<-- MoMA
- Started
- Last post
- 57 Responses
- unknown0
and you didnt ask him?
Any links to the stuff for Time + Newsweek?
- JazX0
I't a Moma Moment at NT
- oeuf0
ridiculous.
- kpl0
chewie, your usage of the word "dorkitude" disturbs me alot more than MoMA refreshing their typeface.
- mrdobolina0
I bet those logoloft guys are making some money. that sucks.
- kpl0
they've just made a ton of money being graphic designers.
don't hate.
- oeuf0
Wow, the firm must've study this case for a long long time for coming with a solution as good as that!
- BonSeff0
rrrrraaaarrrrrrrrrr
http://www.logosaurus.com/
- mrdobolina0
bonseff works at logosaurus
- BonSeff0
beleeeb it
- unknown0
yeah - I consider myself a type nerd but this is ridiculous
- unfittoprint0
I began to be very interested in Typography recently, but this is a bit surreal. I'm just wondering what was the price tag on that job.
- balb0a0
is still my all-time favorite heinous logo generator.
click on "logos" in the sidenav, and GO TO TOWN!
- 67nj0
WHAT?
- unknown0
uh, people, some geek made over 10K doing nothing to 4 letters. Only the geekiest of geeks from geekland would ever notice or care about the "subtle change" that the logo underwent. It was purely academic. The story was not written to advance the cause of obscure typography, it was reporting a bixarre case of expensive dorkitude.
- Buckyball20
link? to logo.
not registering for that NY Times crap.
bB
- monkeyshine0
I'm a little surprised by some of the comments here. I'd think that as designers we'd all be excited that attention is being given to this amount of detail (the level of restraint and wisdom shown in the tweaked logo is impressive to me).
I mean, isn't this lack of vision, attention span what we complain about in our clients?