Punches For:

Out of context: Reply #2935

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 3,183 Responses
  • jagara1

    Deepfake porn is not right, and I understand why the people being "portrayed" in it find it highly offensive.

    However - a number of Danish actresses made the news yesterday, complaining about the sex/nudity scenes they filmed for mainstream TV and movies, are being shared in dedicated subreddits.

    How astronomically retarded do you have to be to film a sex scene with full nudity, in the internet age? And not expect some people on the internet to perv over it? You voluntarily took your clothes off.

    jagara 1Permalink
    UpvoteDownvote
    Flag
    • Well that sounds like OnlyFans with extra steps.palimpsest
    • What's this got to do with deepfaked porn?Nairn
    • Deepfake porn is another (actually understandably offensive) way that celebrities are being used as wank material.jagara
    • link?drgs
    • It's in Danish, but here you go: https://www.dr.dk/ny…jagara
    • The sex scenes I meandrgs
    • Oh, hehe. Dunno. Google it, should be easy to find ;)jagara
    • The only complete solution is for humans to abandon clothes wearing, once we are all naked, nudity will be like air.shapesalad
    • *hairNairn
    • "The sequences originate from films and series such as Nordkraft and Doggystyle"
      Is that an accurate translation?      yuekit
    • @yuekit correct.jagara
    • Celebrities have been using CGi and body doubles for ages for nude scenes, which I find pretty disingenuous and cheap.formed
    • don't think i'd consider action sequences and sex scenes as acting tho. it's eye candy and i understand why they'd use doubles.doesnotexist
    • It’s not disingenuous or cheap. It’s a directors vision and not much else.monospaced
    • formed, I bet you want gay characters to be played by gay actors. And doesnotexist, you sound retarded as fuck.crazyprick
    Show [[ numHiddenNotes ]] more notesAdd Note
    SaveCancel

View thread