Apple
Apple
Out of context: Reply #1303
- Started
- Last post
- 3,613 Responses
- Bennn0
Holy shit! 160$ !!!
''Apple AirPods Are $160 Wireless Headphones You Will Absolutely Lose, or Have to Charge Regularly''
- Lifehacker- is this solving a problem people have? rather keeping track of one item you have to keep track of twohotroddy
- The concept of iPhone wireless headphones is great, but this execution and price point isn't what I was hoping for.dopepope
- they should have waited until they could offer a decent wireless option. This just reeks of Apple's greed. What's the margin on those, $159?formed
- you will by a lightweight AirPod Necklace for $50. what's actually two rubber rings linked with some material.sted
- ridiculousPonyBoy
- if the pricepoint surprises you, welcome to Apple my friend. They look real nice but for that money you can get good sounding headphones for sure,Miguex
- those plastic earbuds are shits. you lose all the bass with that slippery plastic. rubber is the best material to completely block the hole of your ear.Bennn
- Not a fan of a wire connecting around the back of my neck. Don't think the shape will work for my ears, but...this is a step in the right direction.Gucci
- To be fair, the current run of Samsung and Bragi wireless earphones cost around $200 - but they have touch controls, onboard storage, and a better fit.face_melter
- Didn't they mention a bunch of other wireless headphones...these aren't the only optionyuekit