Antivaxors
Out of context: Reply #10
- Started
- Last post
- 32 Responses
- GeorgesII0
ok, I get it now,
people who do not genuinely believe that global warming/climate change is exclusively cause by men should be shot or at least brought into carbon free zone,
everyone who also believe that vaccines should not be forced down the throat of those who do not wish to take them should also be shot they are ANTIVAXORZ and will be the cause of the next measle outbreak (btw, vaccinated people are totally immune to measle and can't catch it, google it!!!)
one more thing for sure, people who use drugs any drugs, even recreationally should be locked up, especially weed smokers, they often do it presence of their CHILDREN, it is not safe, weed causes damage to the brain and uncontrollable laughter, it is not safe for our kids and god knows how much we should protect the little one from its diabolical influence
ooh and btw those FAT fatty people, it's not that I disagree with their style of life, but they pollute, consume and shit more than everyone else on this planet, if anyone should go first, it should be them.
I'm not that guy, but africans haven't really contributed a lot to the modern society and it's not that I dislike them, but when you think about it, we should not be letting them FREELOAD on technology and science we have developed here in the west.
I'm not being controversial though,
think about it, why stop with global vaccines deniers, let's push it one step further, this world is filled with people who are slacking and do not think of the greater good,
I do,
and you should too
- If evidence shows that climate change is happening and could be disastrous, should we NOT call out uninformed people who pretend it's not happening?yuekit
- Your argument basically applies to anything. Someone could just as well say you want feminists to be shot since you disagree with them.yuekit
- Since when calling out someone that doesn't not want to listen to your facts ever worked, I think we should gradually move to plan BGeorgesII
- Why are you ignoring the problem ukit, you know full well only a final solution will work with these Deniers!!GeorgesII
- exactly, if you're going to force people to take vaccines that they believe will give them a worst quality or life or kill them, why not just kill them??GeorgesII
- So basically people can't disagree without being accused of literally wanting to kill the other side? Seems a little sillyyuekit
- no uekit, it doesn't work like this, you do not disagree with someone when you force them to take something against their will. so according to you prisoners inGeorgesII
- guantanamo have a disagreement about their treatment, it's not torture, just a disagreement, I really can't fathom why some can not see the slippery slopeGeorgesII
- pro vaxer: I disagree with you, please let me stick a needle in your arm against your will. this is not what disagreement means and you know it full wellGeorgesII
- So how does that equate to killing people or Holocaust?yuekit
- If people don't want to get vaccinated fine, but in that case they shouldn't be allowed to put other kids at risk by going to school with themyuekit
- but the disagreement isn't simply with another person, it's with scientific evidence and the fact that vaccinations WILL save your life.Fax_Benson
- Fax science is dictated by the ethics of those who make it, knowning that 80% of scientific research is funded by corporations, I kinda have to go on a limb andGeorgesII
- say altruism is not what they are aiming to. I have nothing against/pro vaccines, but I do not understand those who put their faith in something they will notGeorgesII
- able to control once started.GeorgesII
- Scientific evidence, once you decided that anything is for the greater good, what stops you to do this same train of thoughts about everything that is retardedGeorgesII
- alcohol should be banned, it kills more people that any outbreak combines, fat people are killing this planet (sigh) and children themselve are one of the biggeGeorgesII
- contributor to polluting this planet, how about we make it that only a certain people with chosen genes get to procreate. Lets not cherrypick the science weGeorgesII
- Alcohol has negative effects on your health over many years, in some cases. It doesn't effect other peoples lives, pretty big difference there.yuekit
- If you send your unvaccinated kid out into a public school with other kids you are putting other peoples lives at risk.yuekit
- But according to you someone is literally Hitler or Stalin for pointing this outyuekit
- alcohol doesn't effect other peoples lives, are you serious mate or you just trolling me at this point,GeorgesII
- why are people so over dramatic over vaccines, if you don't vaccine you're putting the entire society at risk, but I'm asking you what is better forcing peopleGeorgesII
- to take a vaccine agaisnt their will or giving them the choice? I ask again, where do we stop, I wouldn't stop at unvaccinated, they are groups I'd like to getGeorgesII
- rid off too, what should stop me, when the science of obesity, alcohol, iq, apparently is set.. tell me why do you believe we should only target vaxorz?GeorgesII
- You seem to be saying that we can't draw the line anywhere, the only choice is between regulating everything or nothing. Should be obvious why that isn't theyuekit
- case, of course societies have to use judgement about what makes sense and what doesn't.yuekit
- If you are so confident in vaccination then how are putting other people at risk? the outbreaks reported so far are from people who are vaccinated already.yurimon
- Nobody with a brain wants big brother dictating what's best for them but yet the same wack jobs who have a hissy fit about mandatory vaxes are the same ones pragilgamush
- Praying for the socialists to hand them free schools, healthcare and senior services. Mmm the irony. This g2 post is a hyperbole of paranoid delusion, get a grigilgamush
- Grip pal. If you want to be an obese junky African alcoholic Greenpeace antivaxor than go right a fucking head, that's your prerogativegilgamush
- Nobody is paranoid. peoples observation is valid. however it would be good if you can have study to validate, but you can blame people. your not exactly livingyurimon
- in a utopia, uncorrupted and with best intentions. its oke to take precautions of course you get dif extremes. chillax mangyurimon
- ^^cantyurimon
- ^what happened to 'never edit?' who cares, can vs can't? it's all the same dribble.sarahfailin
- I won't chillax because we have already been down this rabbit hole and all your so called evidence contradicts the ridiculous point you try to makegilgamush
- Its possible that children are over vaccinated. there is such a thing, also quality. I'm not against vaccines. I think there are attributes worth investigating,yurimon
- cause there are many observations that might be valid, that ive seen and others have seen.yurimon
- Investigation is a good thing, you need evidence before you can in good conscience claim there is a link between the two. That is just irresponsible. Observatiogilgamush
- Observations alone hold no weight. If you have no experimental results than stop disseminating unfounded conclusionsgilgamush
- Brobrogilgamush