What isn't art?

Out of context: Reply #4

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 147 Responses
  • marychain-4

    And let's not bring Warhol into the discussion. If you don't "get" Warhol...you weren't paying attention.

    • never like the guy.pango
    • Boy, are you trolling?marychain
    • nop :/pango
    • I think you made my point with this statement.monospaced
    • Lol...okay mono. What was your elusive point?marychain
    • I don't think you have a clue about Warholmarychain
    • Warhol was a troll.pango
    • The point is that some people don't consider what Warhol did art. But you say you have to get him to see it as art. That's the point I'm making.monospaced
    • That its all in the way you view something. How you describe and interpret it.monospaced
    • No. It's not. It's the creators intent. It has NOTHING to do with wget her YOU like it or get it. You don't get to decide.marychain
    • Whether it's art or not from your "point of view". You can choose to like it or notmarychain
    • then tell me what's not art.pango
    • I agree, marychain, I think you're making the same point. If the person who paints those stupid figurines thinks they're art, you can't decide they're not :)monospaced
    • No...because his INTENT was NOT to create art...but to CASH in. Have you ever heard Britto speak? pleasemarychain

View thread