What isn't art?
What isn't art?
Out of context: Reply #2
- Started
- Last post
- 147 Responses
- monospaced1
I figure anything (unfortunately?) could be classified as art with the right pitch (bullshitting).
- Wrong answermarychain
- I'm with mono on this one.pango
- Of course you are. You're both very confused.marychain
- ha that's the worst argument.pango
- Wrong. It's about intent. if you're bullshiting....you'r... masking intent.marychain
- I disagree. Many things are considered art even when they were not intended to be.monospaced
- Do tellmarychain
- boxing?pango
- Some people take aerial photos of farmland and call it art, even though the farmers didn't intend to make it beautiful.monospaced
- It really boils down to how you look at something. Some people collect items and their simple placement in the same space is called art.monospaced
- Anyway. No need to get nasty or tell me I'm wrong. Just trying to have a real discussion.monospaced
- whoooboy...I don't know where to begin.marychain
- It does not simply " boil down to how you look at something" where did you get that? Your aerial photo example is rife with problems also.marychain
- It's my view. I didn't get it from somewhere. I'm also not alone.monospaced
- why argue with monodoesnotexist
- I don't even see the argument here. At what point does art become objective?Ianbolton