Apple
Apple
Out of context: Reply #830
- Started
- Last post
- 3,604 Responses
- CygnusZero40
Ive decided to hold off for the next version. I would expect some decent upgrades, and the fact is I dont need this thing at all. It was much different with the iphone and ipad, there felt like there was real uses for them (the phone moreso obviously), but this is a little different. It's just an iphone on your wrist, with less features, not really something entirely new or game changing as the suits say.
It looks ridiculously nice and ill get one eventually, but just due to not feeling a need for it, I can be patient for the next one in 2016. The other thing that helps is I own an Omega and no smart watch will ever be as nice as a watch like that. Obviously totally different concepts though.
- I guess the other annoying thing is in a few years, everyone will have these so they arent unique. I still havent seen another person in public wearing an omegaCygnusZero4
- ... which is kinda cool.CygnusZero4
- A watch is more of a fashion statement than a phone or anything like that. So when half the planet has the same watch, dunno thats kinda weird to me.CygnusZero4
- Please don't tell us you would replace the your Omega with an iFad??! Blasphemy!
These will never look like more than a cool calculator watch.formed - Hell no not replace. I meant as a secondary watch. Just pointing it out that the apple watch will become very common.CygnusZero4
- I heard they sold 10 million already :|CygnusZero4
- Yup, just like calculator watches ;-). It'll be a huge hit, but will eventually be nothing more than a gadget, unlike the Omega, which is class and timeless.formed
- The Apple Watch will look better or get thinner with time. I have no need for a watch when it comes to trying to make a fashion statement. I'd rather have aJaline
- real use for it on my wrist. As it stands now, whenever I wear a watch I forget that I have something that tells time and I check out my phone anyway.Jaline