Fuk u shima
Out of context: Reply #9
- Started
- Last post
- 44 Responses
- prophetone0
you can say what you like but i wholeheartedly disagree with people who love to point out the fine details to attempt disprove the bigger picture that right there in front of us.
fact is, we are f*cking it all up. not atom bomb in one shot style but in little tiny steps. fukushima is one of those steps.
i don't have to worry about being 'significantly affected'? here's the thing, we're talking radiation here it becomes a part of you little by little.
this exact argument was delivered when they started using the full body x-ray machines at airports. 'oh it's not significant enough radiation...' - i'm sorry, have they taken a time machine to 40 years from now when they change their tune to 'we're seeing now due to all the cancer cases that those earlier machines were a really bad idea, whoops!'
- have you take a time machine to 40 years in the future?monNom
- i have, and sh*t gets realprophetone
- Thunderdomeukit2
- It's your choiceprophetone