100 Billion
100 Billion
Out of context: Reply #29
- Started
- Last post
- 32 Responses
- twooh0
We have scientific data though. That is really the only methodology to work with, and the only grounds we should be working with. Everything else would have to be something else, because that's not how science works, yeah?
To be honest, I'm seeing your argument along the lines of, "well, we don't have any evidence to disprove the existence of a deity", when according to our scientific understanding, it's considered unlikely because we're supposed to be basing things off of what we can measure, and not by things we cannot measure. Does this make sense?
- For the record, I don't have a problem with 'what if's'. I think it's important for scientists to keep that in mind.twooh