Shepard Fairey/Stones logo

Out of context: Reply #39

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 73 Responses
  • i_monk0

    Nobody is complaining about a lack of bevelling, too few colours, or any of your other strawmen.

    It's shit because it rapes the lettering to fit the "50" on top, it uses five typefaces/weights in close proximity, it substitutes the 5 for an S and zero for O the way we all did in first year at design school, and in typical Fairey fashion he's made it about himself/his brand (the colours) instead of the client.

    If you needed all of that spelled out maybe you need a vacation.

View thread