gay anti gay?
Out of context: Reply #101
- Started
- Last post
- 159 Responses
- locustsloth0
frankly, mono, i think your lack of tolerance for people of faith is just as disturbing and troubling as the reason for the most reason thread bump; legislators making steps to limit the rights of people based on their sexuality (more on this later).
Seriously mono, while gramme and i don't even see CLOSE to eye to ey regarding religion, his explanations of his viewpoint are always rooted in how he feels about his own beliefs. They are measured and polite. Your viewpoint can be summarized by you pointing at someone (anyone) whom you disagree with and saying "You're stupid!!!" (and then asking for their portfolio).
It's this same sort of intolerance that you, dobs and the rest of us are upset about, isn't it? gramme hasn't said anything against homosexuals aside from "under my belief structure, these people are misguided. This doesn't mean they're bad people". It's his opinion and he's free to have it and express it. Same way that we can express that we think these hypocritical legislators are assholes.
If you want people to be more tolerant, lead by example. If you would like people to be respectful of the viewpoints of yourself and others, do the same for them.- that sums of Newstoday/QBN in a nutshell.JazX
- Also, I don't call people stupid if they voice their opinion. Don't generalize like that; it's not fair.monospaced
- Oh, and show us your work, stupid! :Pmonospaced
- HAHAH @ monolocustsloth
- personally, im sick of being respectful to religious nutcases. if you're delusional, you're delusional.iCanHasQBN