That Will Teach You

Out of context: Reply #11

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 32 Responses
  • mikotondria30

    That utterly reprehensible - the amount she is being ordered to 'compensate' is several orders of magnitude above that which she could have been demonstrated to have defrauded the copyright holders by... They have no right to just up and take other monies of hers as if shes some kind of fucking child who's got caught with some candy and had it taken away. It is not the courts jobs to 'set examples' to as yet unknown and unnamed others - it is the courts job to seek recompense to injured parties through the process of law - not to seek to educate or inform anyone else through it's actions - its not fucking cspan, jeez. If you steal $100 from me - I only want 100 back. Noone esle has any right to take another 10000 from you.
    What bullshit.

    • she stole 1700 songs and they chose to seek compensation for a representation of 24 of those songs,chossy
    • the amount they have sought is allot less than is owed.chossy
    • 1700 songs at 1 dollar each....thats...erm... yes - 1.6million dollars, right.mikotondria3
    • depends on how many people downloaded from her innit, that bag of 24 may have been downloaded more than once matey.chossy
    • then THEY owe the money. Not her.mikotondria3
    • SHE gave them the tracks.chossy
    • They're still responsible for themselves, chossy.juhls

View thread