God's warriors
Out of context: Reply #53
- Started
- Last post
- 703 Responses
- flagellum0
Ah Dawkins, the ultimate sophist. Really should have just stuck with zoology and left the philosophy to real thinkers.
Contrary to that pap, there is no "standard creationist argument". There are a series of empirical evidences which scream of intelligent causation. Complexity is not one of them. Natural processes can in some limited instances, produce complexity. Rather, ONE argument is Specified Complexity. This is when high specificity (information structured for the purpose of attaining a goal - like programming code) is combined with low probability. This is something that Dawkins can't (or won't) wrap his brain around. Dawkins also conjures up an argument from silence which assumes that the designer is "more complex" (in the way you and I understand complexity) than the matter/energy it produced. The man is a joke.
http://www.uncommondescent.com/j…