new CNN
- Started
- Last post
- 29 Responses
- voiceof0
^ I know it should, but the length of the mobile site didn't bother me when using it. Each section was about the length of my phone so it was like I was just jumping sections. I wasn't in a hurry so just leisurely scrolling wasn't an issue.
- mg330
- I love that "In Case You Missed It" completes this (non)parody towards the bottom! hahaha!Krassy
- how the fuck did you get a screen shot of the entire page?organicgrid
- Firefox has Add Ons for screen capture. Check out Easy Screenshot 123. I use Monosnap as an app on my Mac, but it does not do full screen shotsmg33
- not do fullscreen shots.mg33
- Thanks Michaelorganicgrid
- mg330
- mekk0
its so responsive
- boobs0
I couldn't really see the site. Too many fucking popups in the way.
- nb0
- instrmntl0
Kevin Suttle @kevinSuttle 4h4 hours ago
BTW, the @CNN redesign is an utter failure.282 HTTP requests
3.65MB payload
7.547s document competehttp://www.webpagetest.org/resul… ...
#PerfIsUX
- mg330
The mobile version is horrible. When will mass-content providers like this learn that not everything has to be included on a homepage? It feels as bad as any page of Huffington Post with their never-ending sections and headings.
- autoflavour0
its ok, but where is the porn?
- Nathan_Adams0
They couldn't at least use 2x assets for their logo? It's a blurry mess on high resolution screens.
- But some icons across the site (and even some ads) are...Nathan_Adams
- Yupset
- Krassy0
i'm exhausted after looking at it for just a min
usability: FAIL
- inteliboy0
wait, wasn't CNN updated not long ago? I remember it being really nice...
- studderine0
The roll-overs on the main navigation are infuriating.
- moldero0
mobile works well