NYTimes
- Started
- Last post
- 14 Responses
- omahadesigns0
http://www.bostonglobe.com/ is much better.
- that 400px high footer that pops up is NOT betterdoesnotexist
- Responsive is better.omahadesigns
- for a site such as this, responsive is not good enough imo, they have a separate mobile site, gets special attentionprophetone
- ...attention. it's good too.prophetone
- CygnusZero40
Way too much shit to look at.
- It's called news.omahadesigns
- get back to your comics, kid.set
- doesnotexist0
the article pages are great
- nb0
Looks great (with AdBlock on)
- instrmntl0
Seems a bit reserved and watered down. I would have liked it more if the width wasn't fixed as well.
- colin_s0
looking good.
- prophetone0
it's good. it stays.
- prophetone0
Miniature version: http://mobile.nytimes.com
- ...which, btw, is actually responsive. i like it.prophetone
- mg330
I find it a little odd that they don't shift to a small logo when the persistent nav kicks in. A brand that big? I can't believe they don't maintain the logo at all times.
- you think people forget what news site they're browsing?doesnotexist
- No. it just seems odd to see the logo removed completely.mg33
- Removed? It's still there, just smaller.nb
- mg330
Actually... I don't know that I'm seeing the new version. Can someone post a screenshot of it? I feel like I'm seeing something that doesn't match this: http://www.nytimes.com/redesign/…. The homepage sure isn't responsive for me.
- home page isn't responsive, but fonts are consistent with apps nowdoesnotexist
- omg0
- they've had that, yodoesnotexist
- since when?omg
- Since China started ruling the world.freedom
- ukit20
Looks nice, but I wonder why the homepage is fixed width and inner page full screen.
- chrisRG0
Article pages look great but homepage is awful to read