Star Trek Into Darkness
- Started
- Last post
- 85 Responses
- pr20
who lets this idiot direct? (or more appropriate question should be how many cocks per day this guys has to suck?)
- marychain0
Just saw it...Majorly dissapointed. Action was ok...but it was flat somehow and terribly predictable. Enjoyed iron man a lot more.
- ETM0
What was wrong with the last one? Because they decided to make it more accessible to the masses?
- the lense flare thing needs to gospl33nidoru
- Even J.J. agreed they over did it, in retrospect.ETM
- CALLES0
looks like spock is gonna bite the bullet
- set0
WANT
- liveforever0
i'm not trekky but i'm guessing spock dies in this one
- Too important/iconic. Wont happen.CygnusZero4
- Kill the old Spock, not the young one.CygnusZero4
- They live long and prosper.CyBrainX
- ETM0
- i_monk0
Yes, that's the reason it sucked, because they made it "accessible". It had nothing to do with the utterly nonsensical plot, which saw the antagonist travelling back in time not to save his planet from destruction by giving them two decades to evacuate, but to seek revenge on people who had nothing to do with the destruction, in the process going on an off-screen adventure to turn his dinky mining ship into an unholy planet annihilator which he turns against the two most important planets in the Federation (that are completely undefended, save for a handful of cadets, because every fucking space ship they own has been sent off to some nebula somewhere) and can only be stopped by three people separately marooned on the same planet within walking distance of each other, while fucking lens flares obscure everything on screen.
- How annoying would it be to hang out with this guy? Bet he nitpicks everything. It was a fun movie. Good enough for me.CygnusZero4
- I have several friends this bad.CyBrainX
- utopian0
Unfortunately I should of waited for Redbox.
The movie blows monkey balls!
- scarabin0
who goes to the theater and gets so hung up on a lens flare they can't enjoy the film?
that's like hating star wars because the ships make sound in space when they shouldn't
- Ships dont make sound in space? So theres no sound at all in space?CygnusZero4
- there's no air for the sound waves to travel throughmonospaced
- Theres no air in space?CygnusZero4
- Google has mail?monospaced
- there IS air in space because earth is in space therefor there are cats in space toomoldero
- What about fire? Fire needs air. No fire in space?CygnusZero4
- Like if the space shuttle blew up in space it would just be parts flying around, no explosion?CygnusZero4
- it would burn any air available, that's it, therefore no spooge in spacemonospaced
- I thought everyone knew there was no sound/fire/explosion... in outer space.ETM
- wat bout da space tween you ears?utopian
- monospaced0
Spielberg has been using that lens flare thing for decades. I like it.
- Speilberg: one flare every 15 mins.
Abrams: 15 flares every minute.i_monk
- Speilberg: one flare every 15 mins.
- _niko0
lens flare's and plot holes (what movie doen't have those) aside, the last one was a wild ride, they captured the spirit of Kirk and the original crew perfectly.
- Akagiyama0
Paramount says Cumberbatch's character is John Harrison. What the....
- No idea who that is. I didnt think he was Kahn though.CygnusZero4
- *khanCygnusZero4
- i_monk0
I saw this when it came to Netflix but can't remember a thing about it.
- ernexbcn0
I hope they bring back the wookies on this one.
- mg330
Do moms still call it Star Track?
- albums0
I hope they bring back the tribbles on this one.