Public Voice Network
- Really? 1515
- Stag Do - London 11
- Freelance Billing and Tim… 4242
- the gif animation thread 1844918449
- best on Netflix streaming… 233233
- Xbox: New Generation Reve… 6161
- DaftPunk 208208
- WtF? 1010
- The Silk Road 22
- Gay thread 122122
- Ray Manzarek, RIP : / 1616
- Pic of the Day 7470574705
- Weird iStock images 209209
- Smatik Update 2013 33
- Vid of the Day 1505215052
- E-Books: A New Art Form? 33
- Famous Street Artists 44
- Show some recent work 55535553
- San Francisco 1717
- Client of the Day 148148
- starting a design busines… 33
- Server-side Video FX 1111
- Name this design style 3737
- WTF 22
Shooting of the Day 10531053 Responses
Last post: 3 days, 6 hours ago | Thread started: Aug 6, 12, 12:11 p.m.
- moldero
^
do you consider everyone with a gun a "gun freak"? even the responsible ones?
i have friends in Vegas and AZ who have AR's, Uzi's AK's crap like that but these guys are solid in the head, they have lives, real jobs, their hobby just consists of shooting in the desert or at the range, thats all. some of them are even cops, ex military or just regular dudes, but solid dudes, and I dont consider them gun freaks even though they choose to arm themselves way more than I choose to.to me this is a gun freak:
i knew a guy I went to school with (worked at AMD in the bay area, probably still works there) went to his house because he was selling an AK, figured I had the extra $$ at the time, ill go check it out, didnt buy though, it was just a waste on $$ in my opinion, but back to the point, dude had fucking sand bags on his windows in his basement, besides the AK47 he had an M16 or some shit converted to shoot Russian rounds "just in case the Russians took over he could use their bullets" those were his words exactly. now thats a gun freak to me. Boxes and Boxes of Russian ammo next to his bed, oh and heavy barrels to dissipate the heat, lol, i was like "dude wtf man?"

- Dog-earAug 6, 12, 12:56 p.m. – Permalink
- randommail
USA now has more guns than it does people!
Yeah, we're NUMBER ONE!!!
Now all we need are a couple more mass murders and we can break into the top 10 list of highest firearm-related death-rate! We're right behind Mexico! Cmon USA, we can do it.

- Dog-earAug 6, 12, 1:07 p.m. – Permalink
- georgesIII

- Dog-earAug 6, 12, 1:30 p.m. – Permalink
- waterhouse
Shooting Sikhs? What a misinformed retard.

- Dog-earAug 6, 12, 2:18 p.m. – Permalink
- BrokenHD
The difference between guns and knives is paramount in this debate.
Consider this: Guns offer a human the ability to pull a trigger and instantly inflict deadly harm on someone—sometimes based on two seconds of rational or irrational thought.
Wielding a knife in a deadly manner requires a great deal of skill, strength, endurance and, most importantly, perseverance. One might actually start to regret their actions before their victim is mortally wounded.
Therefore, I posit that limiting access to firearms will indeed reduce the number of violent murders committed.
PS. Poisoning a large number of people (or any other small-scale WMD) is much more likely to be detectable and preventable than either firearms or sharp objects. I suggest we can remove those from this debate.
HD


- Dog-earAug 6, 12, 9:50 p.m. – Permalink
- ukit2
Like a lot of things in America, I think it's a case of the commercial interests more than anything.
The gun industry lobbies politicians who tell people guns are some kind of sacred right and we can't put any restrictions on it. All this resulting in...more gun sales. Rinse and repeat.


- Dog-earAug 6, 12, 10:10 p.m. – Permalink




