Public Voice Network
- OnSite 3333
- blog 5768957689
- Pic of the Day 7466874668
- Vid of the Day 1504015040
- the gif animation thread 1843218432
- Internet laptop things 33
- what is hand made? 1515
- Angelina Joile boobs.. 2929
- Facebook IPO 346346
- chrome font rendering 77
- Your Bike 266266
- e-cigarettes 3131
- Quote someone 11501150
- standalone flip through? 66
- Official NSFW Thread 251251
- FMT170513 1010
- SNEAKERS 479479
- 80's-90's MEMORIE… 12681268
- The Seasteading Institute 55
- Chick of the Day 1824618246
- Game of Thrones 298298
- Kanye video projections i… 1717
- Scary Cool Tech Thread 312312
- The Powerball 4141
Printing challenges 22 Responses
Last post: 9 months, 2 weeks ago | Thread started: Aug 2, 12, 8:26 a.m.
- RustyStew
Hi QBN dudes,
I have a challenge, and I am needing to reach out beyond my normal resources here for information. (Also, thinking I should have done this a while ago).
We have a client that we have traditionally printed 4c+2PM/same. One of those colors in particular has shifted way to dark, then way to yellow ect. ect. It has not been associated any longer with a straight PMS color for at least the past 5 years (as long as I've known this client). And is a moving target of sorts.
This year we have been redesigning their materials, and with their conservative nature we haven't been able to move completely away from said frustrating color. It's also a core branding color for them. That being said, we were able to convince them to change it slightly, so now we have a PMS swatch associated with it, but it isn't a spot, it is a CMYK swatch, because there isn't an actual spot close enough. It is built out of only 2 of the 4 colors so we figured it would be easier to hit more consistently since the printers[1] have at least some reference to a swatch.
Now, we have moved to printing their pieces 4c/4c in all cases. Is this a horrible idea?
- Aug 2, 12, 8:26 a.m. – Permalink
- monospaced
If the new color is made of two standard CMYK colors, I don't think it'll be a problem. Did I read that right?

- Dog-earAug 2, 12, 8:39 a.m. – Permalink




