Public Voice Network
- Auto Racing? 88
- Chick of the Day 1825618256
- Public domain?
- QBN Personas 1212
- Chick of the day .Gif 5555
- Pic of the Day 7479074790
- Align shortcode Divs? 1616
- Viewing Old PC Hard Drive… 77
- Paid vacation? 2727
- You're Doing It Wrong… 88
- weird 3d stuff 9696
- The Purge 2020
- blog 5771357713
- Hiphop like this. 7474
- DaftPunk 224224
- the gif animation thread 1849618496
- CSS z-Index 11
- Cape Cod 1414
- Technological Eye Strain 1717
- Best American band of all… 127127
- Bitcoin 130130
- QBN EXPATS 4141
- Architecture of the Day 436436
- Cool tumblr themes? 1010
InDesign to Web? 3737 Responses
Last post: 1 year, 1 month ago | Thread started: Apr 2, 12, 8:05 p.m.
- monNom
see your other thread for answers http://www.qbn.com/topics/672594…


- Dog-earApr 2, 12, 10:49 p.m. – Permalink
- animatedgif
Try Fireworks.
- Proper align, spacing and distribute tools
- Pixel snapped vector shape support + shortcut key to re-snap vectors to pixels if they ever do slip, no more doing this manually like in Photoshop.
- Pages and the ability to export those to flats in about 3 clicks
- Definable text and layer effect styles
- Flash style symbols/smart objects with 9-slice re-scalling
- Copy and paste appearance/effects from one object to another
- http://johndunning.com/fireworks… < This is life changing for web layouts
- Non-destructive gaussian blur as a layer effect
- Stackable re-orderable layer effects
- Copy and paste from Illustrator preserving vectors
- REDEFINEABLE ROUNDED CORNERS ON ALL RECTANGLESAdobe are a bunch of bellends for not pushing this program better, it makes Photoshop look like a joke for web design.


- Dog-earApr 3, 12, 2:22 a.m. – Permalink
- doesnotexist
don't. it's retarded. it's not 1:1 and you should be shot.


- Dog-earApr 3, 12, 7:23 a.m. – Permalink
- ESKEMA
I don't know if it's because people does not know how to use ID, but it needs to be said, ID is NOT a print only software, it is fully capable and perfect for pixel work too. Maybe you're frustrated because of shitty designers presenting shitty work on it because they come from print and don't know better, but that's not the software fault.
quick examples to illustrate:

- Dog-earApr 3, 12, 7:47 a.m. – Permalink
- animatedgif
Just because it can doesn't mean it should.
The web mode is a recent hack added to what's a 13 year old print design app.
It might be superior to PS, but PS was a fucking stupid thing to design web pages with in the first place. Should be using something built from the ground up with web design in mind.


- Dog-earApr 3, 12, 9:16 a.m. – Permalink
- mirrorball
use Muse


- Dog-earApr 3, 12, 9:21 a.m. – Permalink
- zarkonite
InDesign can work really well for web design, especially CMS websites. I wouldn't use it for a site that requires a lot of graphic design (in the sense of heavy use of graphics integrated with the content cuz you'll end up using photoshop for image manipulation so might as well stay in there) but anything corporate or typographic it's definitely a great tool.
Problem is, I've not met a single dev that can handle INDD files.
Question I have for you Eskema: if you have a style, like a drop shadow, on an object. How do you export that to a PNG for the web from IND? In Ps you can just make a smart object, select, copy, new file, paste, save for web.

- Dog-earApr 3, 12, 10:01 a.m. – Permalink
- zarkonite
http://www.firstcarstory.com/ <-- if you were to use Indesign for a site like this, wouldn't you spend most of your time in Photoshop?

- Dog-earApr 3, 12, 10:07 a.m. – Permalink
- ESKEMA
@zarkonite
I have no problems with using any software, I use them all. I need to use several because each serve it's purpose. And for layouts, ID is far superior. I'm not saying that while using it, I won't touch PS or AI. That's just stupid and limitating. I just cringe everytime I see someone say ID is for print and can't do web. Yes it can, yes it does. And it all depends on the job in question.
Like what you show, it doesn't make much sense to do it in ID. That's fine, there's others more fit to the task. But doing The New Yorker site (http://www.newyorker.com) in PS is equally retarded.I tried to grasp FW but I wasn't confortable with it. That doesn't mean it's bad software, just that I'm bad with it and don't have a lot of time to experiment with it for now (I'm sure I'll be tempted again somewhere down the road)...
The point of this is, know your tools, know your team, use the tool you're confortable with (and the rest of the team) and use it well, if it doesn't do the job, switch to a more fitting one. Or maybe don't do stuff you shouldn't be doing at all because it makes us all look bad...
(the you's in this text do not refer to anyone in particular)
- Dog-earApr 3, 12, 10:48 a.m. – Permalink






