Public Voice Network
- Yahoo buying Tumblr
- Name this design style 1111
- blog 5769057690
- Pic of the Day 7467474674
- the gif animation thread 1843618436
- Show some recent work 55515551
- Chick of the Day 1824818248
- North Korea? 3131
- CSS WebKit image buttons? 33
- MILF's and curvy chic… 274274
- Skateboarding. 765765
- Vid of the Day 1504215042
- Studio VS Agency VS Consu… 44
- Kanye video projections i… 1818
- What are you listening to… 55755575
- Angelina Joile boobs.. 3030
- Pic of the day - DESIGN 10321032
- OnSite 3333
- Internet laptop things 33
- what is hand made? 1515
- Facebook IPO 346346
- chrome font rendering 77
- Your Bike 266266
- e-cigarettes 3131
large scale fabric printing 44 Responses
Last post: 1 year, 6 months ago | Thread started: Oct 28, 11, 10:34 a.m.
- sigg
my boss and i are kicking around the idea of printing a large mural 40'x25'-ish for the wall next to our ping pong table. we're thinking of going fabric printing as not to ruin the wall with vinyl.
can anyone guestimate how much this would cost or who could get this done?
thank you!
- Oct 28, 11, 10:34 a.m. – Permalink
- johnny_wobble
I used to work for these guys and they did a lot of fabric printing for these things... http://www.cinemadesigngroup.com…
Where are you at? They're in Florida now, if you call them ask, they could probably point you to who they use.


- Dog-earOct 28, 11, 10:43 a.m. – Permalink
- bjladams
i've never printed anything on fabric over 12' tall - but as far as prices go - they're usually around $8-$12 a sq ft.
also, look for someone that offers dye-sublimination and get a textile that's made for tension display. (don't need to buy a frame - they just print nicely as they're made for closer viewing)
the down side to textile printing, is that the static draws in huge amounts of lint and dust - and at that size, you're not gonna be able to just throw it in the washer.


- Dog-earOct 28, 11, 12:15 p.m. – Permalink
- Knuckleberry
If you are in southern california I would go with Bannerland


- Dog-earOct 28, 11, 2:27 p.m. – Permalink


