Sexual Predatorette
- Started
- Last post
- 68 Responses
- SrSamaurai0
her probation officer probably wishes he could get in on the action
- juhls0
instrmntl: "When men do this, they're kiddie rapers, but if women do this, they're given a pass. She had sex with a 13 year old! So wrong."
Some of the guys in this thread are doing a good job of making it seem like it's OK.
- whereRI0
wait. not only did these lil 13 yr old bastards get laid, they got paid too?! WTF? id have loved that job when i was a wee lad.
- ghandolf0
I thought this thread was about using sexual language in a tourette syndrome attack on a minor...
- fxone0
waits for someone to post pics from her FB...
- vitamins0
Everyday is a new internet humiliation.
- CockDiesel0
I just added her as a friend on Facebook.
- worth a shotdrgz
- She won't get it for a while, she's in prison, I think. :PContinuity
- Poochie0
Zack Galafianakis: You know that kid who had sex with his high school teacher about a year ago? I read online today that that kid died, today. He died of high-fiving. He was in a high-fiving accident.
- Douglas0
I remember having a paper route when I was 13 and hoping every older woman on my route would invite me in for a "tip". I most likely would've froze with my jaw on the floor at the first sight of a boob though.
- CygnusZero40
She's ugly. This would be interesting if she looked decent.
- Sep0
I guess you guys aren't nearly old enough to have a 13-year-old son.
Imagine your own child being one of the many manipulated and used as a sex-toy by a 42-year old woman...
Still hot and funny?
Nevermind, carry on. This thread will hit 20 pages filled with lame drivel by tuesday no doubt.
- georgesIII0
kids nowadays are growing up watching the sickest porn,
they probably instigated the whole thing,
anyways, pics of didn't happen!!!- Wouldn't surprise me to learn 4chan had something to do with this, somehow.Continuity
- instrmntl0
Makes you realize, seeing the difference between male and female offenders, that law is gender biased and male dominated.
- boobs0
Historically, this was never considered a crime. Probably because boys can't get pregnant, and likely enjoy the experience. I mean, they have to be aroused for there even to be an "act."
I still have a hard time believing that this has now become a "crime." I really do. But, I guess the vast majority of people are jealous prudes.
- I hope you're kidding. What if this was a man and a little girl instead? The law can't be that sexist anymore.juhls
- Well, that's just the point. Men and women, and boys and girls, are different. It's silly that the law treats these things the same. Just silly. They aren't.boobs
- I can't believe what I just read...Sep
- boobs has a point there...
yes the chick was a pervert but I would love hear that the kids sayMiguex - same. Just silly. They are different things. They are not analogous. That they are legally treated the same is stupid.boobs
- stupid. It's an utterly foolish problem with the law, that has nothing to do with real problems in the real world.boobs
- Right. Because boys know exactly what they're doing and know all the consequences at that age.juhls
- If you're underage, you're underage. What if a girl slept with her teacher and loved it?juhls
- And didn't have any psychological problems as an adult? Happens less, but it can happen.juhls
- Won't the teacher stretch her out? What if he was hung like a horse?vitamins
- Miguex0
niiiiiiiiice
- Sep0
You know how many rape-victims, children and adults, don't speak out because they feel ashamed about their physical reaction to the assault?
Basically you're saying: If it got hard or wet, they must've been enjoying it...
That's some grade a bull right there.- @boobs BTWSep
- ...and the arousal thing happens with girls who want to have relations with their teachers as well. Doesn't mean it's acceptable.juhls
- it's acceptable.juhls
- no, I don't think he said that, I think he is talking about, what if they actually enjoyed it, I think you are putting words on his mouth :(Miguex
- mouth :(
Miguex
- boobs0
Juhls, I'm not saying boys "know the consequences." It's just that "the consequences" don't particularly exist for them.
Unlike girls in a similar situation, they do not face the threat of pregnancy. They do not face the threat of public ridicule or ostracism. There is no tradition, in the west, that condemns male heterosexual behavior, at whatever age.
Girls and women, rightly or wrongly, face stigmas because of sexual activity. Men don't.
The boys in quo have not "lost" anything. They have not "been embarassed." They have not been rendered "unfit for marriage." In short, they face no negative consequences, in our society, from this behavior. They are not victims. Why should the woman be considered to have "harmed" them?
The idea that she has harmed these boys is silly. They'll be the envy of everyone at their school, and more popular than they were before.
She should be embarrassed. But that's about it.
It's a very good example of the old expression, "the law is an ass."
- You do not look at the point of view of the underage person in this situation. They don't know any better.juhls
- maybe they caught an std or some shitfxone
- Of course I look at the point of view of the "underage" boys: I'm jealous I didn't have a similar experience at their age.boobs
- What if he was 5 years old? You're not an adult until you're 18, and I'm fine with that law.juhls
- The idea that everyone needs to wait until 18 to have sex contravenes biology, norms of behavior, and common sense.boobs
- I'm speaking about the age of consent. You can still have sex with other people around your age before then.juhls
- I thought boys could get older women pregnant?404NotFound