WTF and I mean
- Started
- Last post
- 37 Responses
- moldero0
"john whats your name?"
- sigg0
was he using drugs? yes
did he have said drugs in his home? yes
did the cops need to shoot the dogs? no
did the cops know a kid was going to be there? no
would that have stopped them anyways? no
should the drug user thought of that? yes
should the drug user put his kids in potential jeopardy like that? no
could this have been a bad tip? yes
do you think the cops did their research before busting in? yes
do you think cops had probable cause? yes
do you think they had to present their findings to a judge who ordered the warrant? yes
do you think that judge weighed in on all findings? yes
was there enough findings to issue an immediate warrant? yes
could the cops have overreacted? yes
did the cops know exactly what they could have expected before entering the home? no
do you think they were assuming he was armed? yes
do you think they were assuming he was not alone? yesand here we are
- georgesIII0
There will be no curiosity, no enjoyment of the process of life. All competing pleasures will be destroyed. But always — do not forget this, Winston — always there will be the intoxication of power, constantly increasing and constantly growing subtler. Always, at every moment, there will be the thrill of victory, the sensation of trampling on an enemy who is helpless. If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face — forever.
—Part III, Chapter III, Nineteen Eighty-Four
- bigtrickagain0
- < I thought the same thing. Internet fights crack me up. wanna fight!capn_ron
- quack0
lol@calcium breezing in with rose scented shit
if your dog attacks me i'd kill it. with my bare hands.- I watched someone kick my friends dog and that guy wound up needing an ambo.calcium
- ganging up on people is your thing huh?quack
- i can well believe you would kill someone's dog, quack.bigtrickagain
- Who said anything about ganging up on anyone.calcium
- calcium0
I can't take anyone named quack serious.
Kid in house. Multiple shots fired. One dog killed. Another dog injured. All for a tiny bit of pot. Let's get real.
If you don't see how this isn't on the police's hands you are ridiculous.
I'm going to go back to listening to Good Riddance now.
- melq0
Anytime someone invades a home occupied by dogs, the dogs will "show signs of agitation". All dogs, no matter the size, have a job description that includes "keep strangers out—particularly in the middle of the night".
The police never experienced this before? They're only option is to force their way in and start shooting?
There is no defense for the behavior of the officers. If, in fact, the suspect had 42 tons of weed in the place, so what? You have to invade his home in the middle of the night to make a safe arrest? You think the suspect is never leaving the house again?
The officers open fire, in the dark, on short moving things, while there is a child in the house?
I could give two fucks about the pot-dealing suspect; you have to be outraged to see this type of behavior and even more so when you realized that this is how their departments train them to act.
- do distribute drugs around your family and this won't be a problemquack
- "If you don't want your dogs shot and your family terrorized, then don't give us a reason to think you're doing something wrong."melq
- ...wrong."melq
- "Honestly, why do we need a warrant at all? If there's nothing to hide then there's nothing wrong."melq
- "While we're at it, why should you care if I search your trunk? You're on public roads, after all."melq
- "Maybe law enforcement keep a sample of your DNA on record, just in case."melq
- "If you're not a police officer or in the military, why would you need to own a gun?"melq
- "Why would any law-biding citizen need/want to read books on [ - insert sensitive topic here - ]?"melq
- +1iCanHasQBN
- quack0
georgesIII, please explain to me your mathematical stupidity
http://www.qbn.com/topics/632074…
- bigtrickagain0
TO ALL YOU DOUBTERS:
http://www.columbiatribune.com/n…the dogs were shot and one was killed.
- i never doubted, just called him out for his biased journalismquack
- georgesIII0
for those who still debate it, I just google the thing
http://blogs.riverfronttimes.com…
- quack0
well, not being a cop, i can't be certain, but something tells me they bring more force to a guys house that is being served a warrant for narcotics with a narcotic and assault history.
luck favors the prepared
- georgesIII0
quack everything you've watched is normal,
georgesIII video posted May 5, 10, 10:05 a.m.
quack response May 5, 10, 10:18 a.m.time of video 4:29 m
-
quack couldn't watch the entire video before posting his rant,
case closed!YEeeeeeeeeeeeAAAH
- 13 minutes?quack
- quack's first response was at 10:07bigtrickagain
- then i watched the video, yeeeeaaaahhh
idiotsquack
- PIZZA0
saw nothing to suggest the dog was shot in the video, didn't hear any shots and saw a dog running around when they'd already secured him.
Don't give a shit about wasters anyway
- did you have the volume turned off? there were a couple shots fired very loudlybigtrickagain
- oh a dog was shot, its sadquack
- how did you not hear the gunshots?? how do you function on a daily basis being so fucking... oblivious.iCanHasQBN
- lowimpakt0
what exactly is "justifiable force"?
how do you measure that?
- sequoia0
http://media.www.themuleskinner.…
Here he is again, this time for assault.
- quack0
i like how you state this for sympathy to your belief...
(one a pit bull that was caged in the kitchen and the other a Corgi)
but you have cited no source and there is a dog moving in the video i see, no dog dead or shot in a cage