Public Voice Network
- ATTN: Greedy Republicans 2626
- Beeeees! 1313
- Aging = Scary 1414
- Prometheus 145145
- Pic of the Day 6331563315
- The Pitch 114114
- Outfit of the Day 55
- the gif animation thread 1283912839
- Vid of the Day 1203512035
- FACE EATER 1616
- Pentagram: Forty Story 22
- Bilderberg 11
- alternatives to chrome?? 1111
- What are you listening to… 47024702
- Minimum rate? 33
- blog 5626556265
- Chick of the Day 1538315383
- Coda 2 3636
- Show your latest Pics 32953295
- News of the day... 138138
- Battlefield 3 305305
- New York 88
- Music over 5.1 System 66
- Random Fascinations? 55
rebranding Playboy 5656 Responses
Last post: 2 years, 2 months ago | Thread started: Mar 22, 10, 8:43 a.m.
Out of context: Response #17 [Mar 22, 10, 8:43 a.m.]
- Khurram
another beef with the bunny, as well as the fact that it promotes fatties.
it's a bit misogynstic/paedophillic portrayal of women - not that that magazine latently isn't, which it is.
But fucking bunnies. That's for little girlies "awww, bunny wabbit!" naiive, simple, BIG EYES, like Betty Boop or Marilyn Monroe, all like "don't ask me! I'm just a little girl!" fuckin paedos.
A "fox" is much more representative of a mature female form - wiley and independent, yet still youthful enough to be worth fucking and impreganting with my cock.
Like for the male archetype it would be A BULL.
This is a symbolic discourse on the redesign, in terms of symbolism.
Add some DD titties on there and you're good to go!
- View thread
