Public Voice Network
- ATTN: Greedy Republicans 2626
- Beeeees! 1313
- Aging = Scary 1414
- Prometheus 145145
- Pic of the Day 6331563315
- The Pitch 114114
- Outfit of the Day 55
- the gif animation thread 1283912839
- Vid of the Day 1203512035
- FACE EATER 1616
- Pentagram: Forty Story 22
- Bilderberg 11
- alternatives to chrome?? 1111
- What are you listening to… 47024702
- Minimum rate? 33
- blog 5626556265
- Chick of the Day 1538315383
- Coda 2 3636
- Show your latest Pics 32953295
- News of the day... 138138
- Battlefield 3 305305
- New York 88
- Music over 5.1 System 66
- Random Fascinations? 55
rebranding Playboy 5656 Responses
Last post: 2 years, 2 months ago | Thread started: Mar 22, 10, 7:50 a.m.
Out of context: Response #11 [Mar 22, 10, 7:50 a.m.]
- Khurram
Also, my problem with the "bunny" is that it denotes the sort of feminine qualities that men were into in teh 50s/60s - i.e. fat bitches.
"Bunnies" are fatties, aka, rubenesque, aka voluptious, aka curvy, aka pear-shaped, aka fatties.
All the "playmates" in the pictures of the women in that era dressed as "bunnies" are fatties. That's why none of the modern playmates dress as "bunnies" cos they look like fatties, aka bridget jones.
The fox is much more representative of the slender modern female sexual form propagated in our culture.
Add some DD titties on there and you're good to go!

- View thread




