Public Voice Network
- Pic of the Day 6331563315
- Aging = Scary 1313
- The Pitch 114114
- Outfit of the Day 55
- Prometheus 144144
- the gif animation thread 1283912839
- Vid of the Day 1203512035
- FACE EATER 1616
- Pentagram: Forty Story 22
- Bilderberg 11
- alternatives to chrome?? 1111
- What are you listening to… 47024702
- Beeeees! 1212
- Minimum rate? 33
- blog 5626556265
- Chick of the Day 1538315383
- Coda 2 3636
- Show your latest Pics 32953295
- News of the day... 138138
- Battlefield 3 305305
- New York 88
- Music over 5.1 System 66
- Random Fascinations? 55
- What is THEIR work? 55
Bloom Box 66 Responses
Last post: 2 years, 2 months ago | Thread started: Mar 17, 10, 1:37 p.m.
Out of context: Response #5 [Mar 17, 10, 1:37 p.m.]
- bruises
If energy costs plummet with the introduction of a highly efficient and portable energy powerplant such as this, what does it mean for the greater capitalist economy that is dependent upon upward growth to survive?
Our need for physical products decrease with the increase in technological advancements -- our lives move toward the virtual realm rather than the physical. More people telecommute reducing the need for cars, more people do online banking reducing the need for bank employees, more people have virtual stores rather than actual storefronts.
It seems that all this can be an explanation for our current economic depresssion. Or is the the start of a downward trend where all our lives become less dependent on the physical things that brought us to where we are today?
If energy is cheap morality, humanity and technology will likely grow by leaps and bounds, but what about the greater economy that is dependent on people to work hard to afford the energy that makes the world go round?
Anyone else wonder about this?


- View thread



