Public Voice Network
- Aging = Scary 77
- blog 5626556265
- Chick of the Day 1538315383
- Outfit of the Day 33
- Coda 2 3636
- Show your latest Pics 32953295
- alternatives to chrome?? 88
- What are you listening to… 47014701
- Vid of the Day 1203412034
- the gif animation thread 1283512835
- News of the day... 138138
- Battlefield 3 305305
- Beeeees! 1111
- New York 88
- Pic of the Day 6330263302
- Music over 5.1 System 66
- FACE EATER 1212
- Random Fascinations? 55
- What is THEIR work? 55
- Meme of the day 1414
- Letterpress process video 33
- Video Cameras Under $2000 77
- ATTN: Greedy Republicans 2323
- XBMC 33
Internet Explorer 9 4141 Responses
Last post: 2 years, 2 months ago | Thread started: Mar 16, 10, 11:01 a.m.
Out of context: Response #13 [Mar 16, 10, 11:01 a.m.]
- ukit
It says they are "excited" about HTML 5. So why are they not even planning comprehensive support for it?
According to Arstechnica, despite the support for video there was "no mention of support" for many other HTML 5 technologies, such as Canvas, web workers, geolocation, at all. So this awesome new browser that won't be available for another year and won't be adopted until a few years...*still won't support many of the key elements of HTML 5. Other companies are enthusiastically adding support - with Microsoft it seems you need to hold a gun to their head to get them to do it.
Don't get me wrong, it's nice they are working on getting performance up to par with competitors. You can see on the benchmarks demo this future version of IE is *almost as good as the current working versions of Chrome, Safari and Opera when it comes to JS performance.

- View thread




