Public Voice Network
- Shit QBNers Say 126126
- Multicolored logos? 77
- Light in the Box Coupons
- Vid of the Day 1096110961
- TYPO San Francisco 55
- Suggest a good movie... 936936
- Logo from Locked PDF? 33
- blog 5557955579
- American Musical Supply C… 11
- Pic of the Day 5937359373
- FMT 020312 4646
- intern -> job 2121
- Your Last Concert 375375
- the gif animation thread 1132211322
- Steve Jobs FBI file 66
- Shit QBNers think 6969
- What are you listening to… 41734173
- Park Slope 22
- The Elder Scrolls V: Skyr… 7676
- ♥ Things girls like ♥ 9696
- AE shadows won't work 99
- Politics 1759717597
- Chick of the Day 1431414314
- Skateboarding. 598598
Internet Explorer 9 4141 Responses
Last post: 1 year, 5 months ago | Thread started: Mar 16, 10, 10 a.m.
- Stugoo
In beta already:
http://ie.microsoft.com/testdriv…- Mar 16, 10, 10 a.m. – Permalink
- jpea
reading the arstechnica article helped a bunch. seems like they're at least doing a better job in being transparent about outstanding features and a timeline of getting them implemented. lets hope it's not derailed. it's weird, these days it seems like microsoft is doing a much better job at being forthright than their main OS competitor... Win Phone 7 looks damn hot, their HP-powered tablet looks f*in hot and maybe (?) they're browser will be at least up to par.

- Dog-earMar 16, 10, 10:23 a.m. – Permalink
- bigtrickagain
we are still supporting ie6 users at my work >_<


- Dog-earMar 16, 10, 10:23 a.m. – Permalink
- ukit
It says they are "excited" about HTML 5. So why are they not even planning comprehensive support for it?
According to Arstechnica, despite the support for video there was "no mention of support" for many other HTML 5 technologies, such as Canvas, web workers, geolocation, at all. So this awesome new browser that won't be available for another year and won't be adopted until a few years...*still won't support many of the key elements of HTML 5. Other companies are enthusiastically adding support - with Microsoft it seems you need to hold a gun to their head to get them to do it.
Don't get me wrong, it's nice they are working on getting performance up to par with competitors. You can see on the benchmarks demo this future version of IE is *almost as good as the current working versions of Chrome, Safari and Opera when it comes to JS performance.

- Dog-earMar 16, 10, 11:01 a.m. – Permalink
- ArmandoEstrada
And they are proud of this? Last time i checked a 55 was a big FAIL. Safari get 100%, Firefox gets 94%. I know its beta, but dont put this up, its embarrassing.


- Dog-earMar 16, 10, 11:06 a.m. – Permalink
- detritus
You whipper snappers forget that it was IE who pulled internet browsing from the brink of collapse borne of Netscape's utter ineptitude - back in the day IE 4 - 5.5 were God-sent.
The JS engine in this IE9 beta sure seems fast and the letterspacing demo works a lot better than in Chrome or FF.
Of course, I don't at all doubt that MS have cherrypicked the tests... very honest of them to keep the Acid test out thee in the open like that.
Just a shame that I don't appear to be able to use the beta demo outside that test garden.


- Dog-earMar 16, 10, 11:57 a.m. – Permalink




