Public Voice Network
- Pic of the Day 6330963309
- the gif animation thread 1283812838
- Vid of the Day 1203512035
- FACE EATER 1616
- Prometheus 143143
- Pentagram: Forty Story 22
- Aging = Scary 1111
- Bilderberg 11
- alternatives to chrome?? 1111
- What are you listening to… 47024702
- Beeeees! 1212
- Minimum rate? 33
- blog 5626556265
- Chick of the Day 1538315383
- Outfit of the Day 33
- Coda 2 3636
- Show your latest Pics 32953295
- News of the day... 138138
- Battlefield 3 305305
- New York 88
- Music over 5.1 System 66
- Random Fascinations? 55
- What is THEIR work? 55
- Meme of the day 1414
Film or Digital? 1010 Responses
Last post: 2 years, 2 months ago | Thread started: Mar 11, 10, 8:17 p.m.
Out of context: Response #8 [Mar 11, 10, 8:17 p.m.]
- vaxorcist
hmmm... I'd really stop worrying and go shoot something really good... digital for the faster feedback testability... then shoot a film shot or two if you want to see what it would look like in film.... get a used 'blad on ebay for cheap, 35mm film is..well not 120 film.... and the flash sync of a leica is not the 500th of a 'blad... and squares are cool.....
then again, if you're into gear, and you like film, and you shoot street... get a 120 TLR.. rolleiflex 3.5E planar if you have the $$... delightful.....
but I have to admit, when I was a digital tech, the files coming out of that old Kodak 14N were really, really good, even if the thing was sloooow and only good under 160 ISO....


- View thread



