Public Voice Network
- Pic of the Day 6330863308
- the gif animation thread 1283812838
- Vid of the Day 1203512035
- FACE EATER 1616
- Prometheus 143143
- Pentagram: Forty Story 22
- Aging = Scary 1111
- Bilderberg 11
- alternatives to chrome?? 1111
- What are you listening to… 47024702
- Beeeees! 1212
- Minimum rate? 33
- blog 5626556265
- Chick of the Day 1538315383
- Outfit of the Day 33
- Coda 2 3636
- Show your latest Pics 32953295
- News of the day... 138138
- Battlefield 3 305305
- New York 88
- Music over 5.1 System 66
- Random Fascinations? 55
- What is THEIR work? 55
- Meme of the day 1414
Film or Digital? 1010 Responses
Last post: 2 years, 2 months ago | Thread started: Mar 11, 10, 7 p.m.
- bigtrickagain
use both! digital for work, film for pleasure. digital is so much easier to work with and faster for pay stuff. i am with ismith here.
and, shit man, if you are buying leicas, you are loooaaaded >_< are you sure you want to use a rangefinder for fashion/editorial stuff? it seems that the advantages of a rangefinder wouldn't be utilized on staged shoots - but maybe it's your style i guess (:


- Dog-earMar 11, 10, 7:41 p.m. – Permalink
- xcreonx
Film for sure.
I know several fashion photographers who shoot on medium format, develop at a nearby pro lab, then scan the negs in their studio. Perfect workflow for them and you get the wonderful exposure latitude, not to mention the "feel", of film at a much higher resolution than a digital camera (the actual scan is higher res, as is the apparent "resolution" of film itself).
I use medium format myself and scan on a Nikon 9000 ED.

- Dog-earMar 11, 10, 8:11 p.m. – Permalink
- vaxorcist
hmmm... I'd really stop worrying and go shoot something really good... digital for the faster feedback testability... then shoot a film shot or two if you want to see what it would look like in film.... get a used 'blad on ebay for cheap, 35mm film is..well not 120 film.... and the flash sync of a leica is not the 500th of a 'blad... and squares are cool.....
then again, if you're into gear, and you like film, and you shoot street... get a 120 TLR.. rolleiflex 3.5E planar if you have the $$... delightful.....
but I have to admit, when I was a digital tech, the files coming out of that old Kodak 14N were really, really good, even if the thing was sloooow and only good under 160 ISO....


- Dog-earMar 11, 10, 8:17 p.m. – Permalink
- garretttt
plus with film there's so many different cameras that shoot completely different images, weither rangefinder, automatic, medium, polaroid.... slr. every camera has its own unique look.
i believe this digital lacks this.
it seems really difficult to tell the difference between Nikon and Canon digital

- Dog-earMar 11, 10, 8:20 p.m. – Permalink


