Public Voice Network
- New York 77
- Beeeees! 55
- the gif animation thread 1283412834
- What is THEIR work? 55
- Battlefield 3 304304
- Random Fascinations? 33
- Music over 5.1 System 33
- FACE EATER 1010
- Meme of the day 1414
- Letterpress process video 33
- News of the day... 137137
- Video Cameras Under $2000 77
- ATTN: Greedy Republicans 2323
- Pic of the Day 6330063300
- Chick of the Day 1537915379
- Show your latest Pics 32943294
- XBMC 33
- what happened? 2222
- F1 2012 1919
- Vid of the Day 1203312033
- paper trail 88
- Facebook IPO 156156
- Diablo III 8383
- Coda 2 3434
Rebrand 1717 Responses
Last post: 2 years, 2 months ago | Thread started: Mar 10, 10, 4:41 a.m.
Out of context: Response #3 [Mar 10, 10, 4:41 a.m.]
- Morning_star
"we felt the current State Government brand failed to capture the unique sense of environment, heritage and culture that Tasmania has to offer"
I've seen the video and the logos are nice enough. The issue I have is that the logo is not a brand. There is no nod to brand values, a brand essence, key messages or proposition. It was impossible to understand what the logo was trying to represent.
Having briefly browsed the Tasmanian Government website it seems that the government has at least four major audiences - Tasmanian Businesses, Tasmanian Residents, Overseas Business and Tourism. Being attractive and satisfying all those audiences with one logo is going to be difficult to say the least.
Having dealt with public sector clients you are likely to end up with something designed by committee, which is how, i'd imagine, that their existing logo came into being. The best of luck to you.
- View thread




