Public Voice Network
- Shit QBNers Say 131131
- Ageless Male
- FMT 020312 4747
- Show Yo Dog 2012
- Ageless Male
- Pic of the Day 5937659376
- Light in the box coupons
- Multicolored logos? 1414
- Politics 1759817598
- blog 5558055580
- Light in the Box Coupons
- Vid of the Day 1096110961
- TYPO San Francisco 55
- Suggest a good movie... 936936
- Logo from Locked PDF? 33
- American Musical Supply C… 11
- intern -> job 2121
- Your Last Concert 375375
- the gif animation thread 1132211322
- Steve Jobs FBI file 66
- Shit QBNers think 6969
- What are you listening to… 41734173
- Park Slope 22
- The Elder Scrolls V: Skyr… 7676
Rebrand 1717 Responses
Last post: 1 year, 7 months ago | Thread started: Mar 10, 10, 4:13 a.m.
- Andy_ssw
Our experimental/self initiated project to rebrand the government of Tasmania, Australia rolls on.
We just uploaded 3 options for review, critique, criticism, praise or indifference.
http://www.rebrandtasmania.com/- Mar 10, 10, 4:13 a.m. – Permalink
- JerseyRaindog
Is he wearing a shirt?

- Dog-earMar 10, 10, 4:39 a.m. – Permalink
- Morning_star
"we felt the current State Government brand failed to capture the unique sense of environment, heritage and culture that Tasmania has to offer"
I've seen the video and the logos are nice enough. The issue I have is that the logo is not a brand. There is no nod to brand values, a brand essence, key messages or proposition. It was impossible to understand what the logo was trying to represent.
Having briefly browsed the Tasmanian Government website it seems that the government has at least four major audiences - Tasmanian Businesses, Tasmanian Residents, Overseas Business and Tourism. Being attractive and satisfying all those audiences with one logo is going to be difficult to say the least.
Having dealt with public sector clients you are likely to end up with something designed by committee, which is how, i'd imagine, that their existing logo came into being. The best of luck to you.
- Dog-earMar 10, 10, 4:41 a.m. – Permalink
- Akiraprise
does a bear shit in the grass?

- Dog-earMar 10, 10, 6:17 a.m. – Permalink
- bored2death

- Dog-earMar 10, 10, 7:14 a.m. – Permalink
- Andy_ssw
Bump.
A new option has just been added for review/discussion and voting.
http://www.rebrandtasmania.com/

- Dog-earJun 21, 10, 6:13 p.m. – Permalink
- neue75_bold
I voted for B, pretty much based on formal reasons, although it feels far too stiff, conservative and expected for a government logo.. The third logo looks great applied to a balloon but when reduced to the size shown here, it just doesn't communicate much, although possibly if simplified (removing the translucent white wavy things) it might look sharper and more focussed... The typeface in option 3 is probably the nicest, but not a fan of the slight size difference, can see why you're doing it, but I'd look at another treatment in order to keep the two words at the same point size, not sure if "Tasmanian" is actually more important than "Government"?
Nice to see you guys are still going with this project!

- Dog-earJun 21, 10, 6:33 p.m. – Permalink
- typist
a bit look like carat concept
http://www.carat.com/carat/index…
- Dog-earJun 21, 10, 7:20 p.m. – Permalink
- mikotondria3
Sorry, the thing I think of first when I think of Tasmania is the complete and utter slaughter and extinction of the native peoples, and the final member of them walking 'out' to capture and eventual lonely death, amidst people that didn't understand him..
I mean, I'm sure it's lovely and all, now, but that's just what I read, and it stuck with me.
- Dog-earJun 21, 10, 7:57 p.m. – Permalink






