Public Voice Network
- Beeeees! 11
- Music over 5.1 System 33
- FACE EATER 1010
- Meme of the day 1414
- Letterpress process video 33
- News of the day... 137137
- New York 66
- the gif animation thread 1283212832
- Video Cameras Under $2000 77
- ATTN: Greedy Republicans 2323
- What is THEIR work? 44
- Pic of the Day 6330063300
- Chick of the Day 1537915379
- Show your latest Pics 32943294
- XBMC 33
- what happened? 2222
- F1 2012 1919
- Vid of the Day 1203312033
- paper trail 88
- Facebook IPO 156156
- Diablo III 8383
- Coda 2 3434
- Euro Crisis 66
- In Dallas for a month 1212
Browsers 2121 Responses
Last post: 2 years, 2 months ago | Thread started: Feb 27, 10, 8:10 a.m.
- welded
I use Safari at home (plus a couple plugins) and WebKit nightlies at work because the web inspector is much improved. I'm with you in that Firefox was my go-to for years, especially on PC, but these days it's for testing only. What gets me is the fake native UI XUL apps have. It's only marginally better than Java apps. I've been keeping Opera up to date and it's a great browser but it always loses me at some point for one reason or another and I've never been a fan of the developer tools. Maybe Dragonfly will start catching up with Firebug and Webkit inspector now that it's an open source project.


- Dog-earFeb 27, 10, 9:01 a.m. – Permalink
- nuggler
icab is a german browser for mac that's worth checking out -- has some handy development tools
http://www.icab.de/

- Dog-earFeb 27, 10, 5:58 p.m. – Permalink
- ukit
One aspect that is interesting to consider (which you touched on briefly) is the difference in terms of how these browsers handle input. Traditionally browsers have two input boxes, one for URL entry and one for search. I've found a lot of the time though that I will subconsciously type searches into the URL address box.
If I type two words into the Safari address box it will take me, annoyingly, to the search results page for my internet provider (Comcast). If I type a single word with no domain suffix, it will add .com on the end, if that doesn't work, it will take me again to the search. Opera handles it the same way.
Chrome on the other hand gets rid of the search box and condenses the URL entry and search into a single box. It takes me to search results for whatever search engine I have set as default when I enter two words or a word with no .com, .net etc.
Firefox has two search boxes but actually works sort of like Chrome - it takes me to the search results if I type in two words. If I type in a single word with no suffix, it does something kind of weird and take me to the most popular match for that term. So typing in "techno site" takes me automatically to http://www.ilovetechno.be/ even though there is actually a http://technosite.com/
Overall, I think Chrome's approach is the best in this area. I don't see any reason to have two different inputs for URL and search when you can easily get by with one. Also I find the Firefox method of routing you to the most popular domain kind of annoying and not all that useful.


- Dog-earFeb 27, 10, 6:18 p.m. – Permalink
- inteliboy
I thought I was the only one who uses Safari. Love it, simple, works, interface is A+, no fuss.
Firefox asks me for updates every time I open it (every other week). Annoying. Firebug plugin is incredible though.
Opera I do like, though barely use.
Chrome I haven't bothered... and why? I don't see why it's worth my time installing. Unless it renders pages at insane speeds and has some super slick interface, then maybe.


- Dog-earFeb 27, 10, 6:24 p.m. – Permalink
- akrokdesign
safari and the fox. both has issues. more or less.


- Dog-earFeb 28, 10, 8:34 a.m. – Permalink
- stewdio
I am so looking forward to test driving Opera 10.50 for OS X when it's released. In the meantime, someone tell me how it handles on PC?
http://www.opera.com/browser/
Click "watch video"

- Dog-earMar 12, 10, 6:38 a.m. – Permalink
- acescence
comicsans-
safari adblock:
http://burgersoftware.com/en/saf…safari developer tools:
http://developer.apple.com/safar…

- Dog-earMar 12, 10, 8:04 a.m. – Permalink







