Public Voice Network
- ATTN: Greedy Republicans 1818
- Chick of the Day 1537915379
- Letterpress process video 22
- New York 44
- Pic of the Day 6329963299
- Show your latest Pics 32943294
- XBMC 33
- what happened? 2222
- F1 2012 1919
- Vid of the Day 1203312033
- the gif animation thread 1282812828
- paper trail 88
- Facebook IPO 156156
- Diablo III 8383
- Coda 2 3434
- Euro Crisis 66
- In Dallas for a month 1212
- shopped? 66
- Oh Amazon. 22
- blog 5626456264
- pdf portfolio 99
- I can see it in the pixel… 1919
- TransFatty @Brooklyn Bowl 1717
- wot dis font? 11
stuff I shot 1919 Responses
Last post: 2 years, 3 months ago | Thread started: Feb 9, 10, 5:39 a.m.
Out of context: Response #14 [Feb 9, 10, 5:39 a.m.]
- cassie
Okay, I guess I have heard it 50 times now, but I guess my question is "why?", when it comes to making the stars clickable. It is being used as a device to show your position on the timeline. It's not like you can see the image you are clicking on. If people were clicking on the stars, which is an awkward way to think about moving through the photos (having to move your mouse every time you click), then it would be easier to skip images I might want for them to see. I would just assume have no stars than make them part of the clickable navigation.


- View thread



