stuff I shot 1919 Responses

Last post: 2 years, 3 months ago | Thread started: Feb 8, 10, 1:58 p.m.

RespondNew TopicDisable Images

• ediot

  Heh, I thought you were referring to shooting things with a gun.

  • ;)– cassie

  

  You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

  Cancel

  Dog-earFeb 8, 10, 2 p.m. – Permalink

• brandelec

  yea, links on homepage not working... and stars for nav not working?

  • < (*)– OSFA

  

  You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

  Cancel

  Dog-earFeb 8, 10, 2 p.m. – Permalink

• monospaced

  Clicking View Portfolio shouldn't be the "only" way to view work.

  Try putting Next and Previous side by side.

  I like the simplicity. I was able to browse your work fast.

  

  You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

  Cancel

  Dog-earFeb 8, 10, 2:01 p.m. – Permalink

• OSFA

  some nice photo there ;)

  • *s– OSFA

  

  You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

  Cancel

  Dog-earFeb 8, 10, 2:01 p.m. – Permalink

• cassie

  yes, the programming is a bit hackish, thank my husband for that. I am the photographer, he is the very sad designer trying to be a programmer :( Thanks for your reactions, these are things we can fix :)

  • sad designer? haha– OSFA

  

  You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

  Cancel

  Dog-earFeb 8, 10, 2:04 p.m. – Permalink

• brandelec

  very nice shots all around. i think the site's design cheapens them a bit. i'd rather just see your shots with less decor around it with a simple nav

  • Sad Designer :(– cassie

  

  You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

  Cancel

  Dog-earFeb 8, 10, 2:06 p.m. – Permalink

• dan5382

  Nice work, however you should make the images clickable (sends you to next piece in line up); also the it doesn't work to click on the stars for nav....hmmmm.

  • good idea... Done!– cassie

  

  You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

  Cancel

  Dog-earFeb 8, 10, 5:20 p.m. – Permalink

• duckofrubber

  Surprised no one has commented on not being able to click on the stars for navigation.

  • post 4 did. ;)– dibec1/2

    Dripping with sarcasm, I like it!– cassie2/2

  

  You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

  Cancel

  Dog-earFeb 8, 10, 8:03 p.m. – Permalink

• DoktorDavid

  Nice work, clean simple lines, fast, would be nice if the stars worked (kept clicking the things)... otherwise - why the double barrel derringer? Just curious...

  • attitude, son.– cassie

  

  You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

  Cancel

  Dog-earFeb 8, 10, 9:03 p.m. – Permalink

• bigtrickagain

  It's not that the site design is ugly - it's just that, for photo sites, it's best to have nothing compete with the images :) Nice work.

  

  You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

  Cancel

  Dog-earFeb 8, 10, 9:06 p.m. – Permalink

• Stian

  Nice work! I think you should make the site much much simpler. Drop the gray bg, and the pink lines. Maybe bigger pics. And yeah, make the stars clickable.

  

  You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

  Cancel

  Dog-earFeb 9, 10, 4:48 a.m. – Permalink

• Ruffian

  Why the lo-res background?

  

  • and change the bg color from white to gray.– Ruffian1/5

    mean no offense, but r u serious?– cassie2/5

    hahaha– OSFA3/5

    Yeah, I was serious.– Ruffian4/5

    Do you mean lo-res or pixelated?– cassie5/5

  

  You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

  Cancel

  Dog-earFeb 9, 10, 5:13 a.m. – Permalink

• cassie

  Okay, I guess I have heard it 50 times now, but I guess my question is "why?", when it comes to making the stars clickable. It is being used as a device to show your position on the timeline. It's not like you can see the image you are clicking on. If people were clicking on the stars, which is an awkward way to think about moving through the photos (having to move your mouse every time you click), then it would be easier to skip images I might want for them to see. I would just assume have no stars than make them part of the clickable navigation.

  • boot the stars. i think most of us clicked on it because there was a hover on them– brandelec1/5

    Yeah, we took the hover off. Don't know why it was doing that to begin with as they were graphics, not buttons. By breaking them apart, that was fixed. I didn't know if people are just agreeing with previous posters or they really, really want to click some stars...– cassie2/5

    Thanks for your opinion!– cassie3/5

    I think alot of people like to skip around, see the first, middle, last, not in order...– vaxorcist4/5

    You think a more literal page representation would work better, like thumbnails? they would be awfully small. Maybe page #'s. Thanks for the feedback!– cassie5/5

  

  You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

  Cancel

  Dog-earFeb 9, 10, 5:39 a.m. – Permalink

• OSFA

  Haha, love the attitude.

  "If people were clicking on the stars, which is an awkward way to think about moving through the photos..."

  You got at least 10 people (designers) ^ that clicked on them, so I am guessing is not that awkward and perhaps, who knows, YOU might be the one that's wrong, instead of everyone else.

  And after you are done deleting the stars, you can move onto 'accepting constructive criticism well' exercises...

  • Agreed!– Stian1/3

    i think she's accepting the criticism pretty well, myself– bigtrickagain2/3

    CAPTAIN CONDESCENDING... TO THE RESCUE!!!!– themousewhisperer3/3

  

  You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

  Cancel

  Dog-earFeb 9, 10, 6:36 a.m. – Permalink

• spraycan

  maybe having the gallery on a loop would be cooler.

  • I thought about this. Could work nicely. Keep u from just sorta crashing n2 the last frame. Thx!– cassie

  

  You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

  Cancel

  Dog-earFeb 9, 10, 7:45 a.m. – Permalink

• therapist

  if you really don't want to have the stars clickable, you should at least invert the colours on them so that active is pink and inactive is grey. Grey being a more appropriate colour for something that isn't clickable. On that note - why are some of your links grey at rest and pink on hover and some of them the other way around?

  • great idea!– cassie

  

  You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

  Cancel

  Dog-earFeb 9, 10, 7:53 a.m. – Permalink

• cassie

  OSFA-

  I guess you took my response differently than was intended.

  • maybe.– OSFA

  

  You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

  Cancel

  Dog-earFeb 9, 10, 8:32 a.m. – Permalink

• themousewhisperer

  I think the images are great. The designer should shoot himself in the face, tho!

  • well, he's a sad designer...– OSFA1/3

    Sad to see the recession is affecting you deeply in OSFAland as well.– themousewhisperer2/3

    Things will pick up. I'm sure of it.– themousewhisperer3/3

  

  You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

  Cancel

  Dog-earFeb 9, 10, 9:52 a.m. – Permalink