stuff I shot 1919 Responses

Last post: 1 year, 12 months ago | Thread started: Feb 8, 10, 1:58 p.m.

Respond New Topic Disable Images

cassie
Just launched the streamlined version of my site today.
http://www.shotbycassie.com/
Feb 8, 10, 1:58 p.m. – Permalink
dibec
no work-e on the click-e. It also crashed safari.
- just tested it on safari... what ver you runnin?
  – cassie1/3
  4.0.4. I tried it in FF. Nice work. You got hit buttons that are either off or not being called correctly.– dibec2/3
  Thanks for the heads up. I'll try to test this further.– cassie3/3
You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.
Cancel
Dog-earFeb 8, 10, 1:59 p.m. – Permalink
ediot
Heh, I thought you were referring to shooting things with a gun.
- ;)– cassie
You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.
Cancel
Dog-earFeb 8, 10, 2 p.m. – Permalink
brandelec
yea, links on homepage not working... and stars for nav not working?
- < (*)– OSFA
You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.
Cancel
Dog-earFeb 8, 10, 2 p.m. – Permalink
monospaced
Clicking View Portfolio shouldn't be the "only" way to view work.
Try putting Next and Previous side by side.
I like the simplicity. I was able to browse your work fast.
You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.
Cancel
Dog-earFeb 8, 10, 2:01 p.m. – Permalink
OSFA
some nice photo there ;)
- *s– OSFA
You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.
Cancel
Dog-earFeb 8, 10, 2:01 p.m. – Permalink
cassie
yes, the programming is a bit hackish, thank my husband for that. I am the photographer, he is the very sad designer trying to be a programmer :( Thanks for your reactions, these are things we can fix :)
- sad designer? haha– OSFA
You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.
Cancel
Dog-earFeb 8, 10, 2:04 p.m. – Permalink
brandelec
very nice shots all around. i think the site's design cheapens them a bit. i'd rather just see your shots with less decor around it with a simple nav
- Sad Designer :(– cassie
You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.
Cancel
Dog-earFeb 8, 10, 2:06 p.m. – Permalink
dan5382
Nice work, however you should make the images clickable (sends you to next piece in line up); also the it doesn't work to click on the stars for nav....hmmmm.
- good idea... Done!– cassie
You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.
Cancel
Dog-earFeb 8, 10, 5:20 p.m. – Permalink
duckofrubber
Surprised no one has commented on not being able to click on the stars for navigation.
- post 4 did. ;)– dibec1/2
  Dripping with sarcasm, I like it!– cassie2/2
You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.
Cancel
Dog-earFeb 8, 10, 8:03 p.m. – Permalink
DoktorDavid
Nice work, clean simple lines, fast, would be nice if the stars worked (kept clicking the things)... otherwise - why the double barrel derringer? Just curious...
- attitude, son.– cassie
You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.
Cancel
Dog-earFeb 8, 10, 9:03 p.m. – Permalink
bigtrickagain
It's not that the site design is ugly - it's just that, for photo sites, it's best to have nothing compete with the images :) Nice work.
You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.
Cancel
Dog-earFeb 8, 10, 9:06 p.m. – Permalink
Stian
Nice work! I think you should make the site much much simpler. Drop the gray bg, and the pink lines. Maybe bigger pics. And yeah, make the stars clickable.
You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.
Cancel
Dog-earFeb 9, 10, 4:48 a.m. – Permalink
Ruffian
Why the lo-res background?
- and change the bg color from white to gray.– Ruffian1/5
  mean no offense, but r u serious?– cassie2/5
  hahaha– OSFA3/5
  Yeah, I was serious.– Ruffian4/5
  Do you mean lo-res or pixelated?– cassie5/5
You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.
Cancel
Dog-earFeb 9, 10, 5:13 a.m. – Permalink
cassie
Okay, I guess I have heard it 50 times now, but I guess my question is "why?", when it comes to making the stars clickable. It is being used as a device to show your position on the timeline. It's not like you can see the image you are clicking on. If people were clicking on the stars, which is an awkward way to think about moving through the photos (having to move your mouse every time you click), then it would be easier to skip images I might want for them to see. I would just assume have no stars than make them part of the clickable navigation.
- boot the stars. i think most of us clicked on it because there was a hover on them– brandelec1/5
  Yeah, we took the hover off. Don't know why it was doing that to begin with as they were graphics, not buttons. By breaking them apart, that was fixed. I didn't know if people are just agreeing with previous posters or they really, really want to click some stars...– cassie2/5
  Thanks for your opinion!– cassie3/5
  I think alot of people like to skip around, see the first, middle, last, not in order...– vaxorcist4/5
  You think a more literal page representation would work better, like thumbnails? they would be awfully small. Maybe page #'s. Thanks for the feedback!– cassie5/5
You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.
Cancel
Dog-earFeb 9, 10, 5:39 a.m. – Permalink
OSFA
Haha, love the attitude.
"If people were clicking on the stars, which is an awkward way to think about moving through the photos..."
You got at least 10 people (designers) ^ that clicked on them, so I am guessing is not that awkward and perhaps, who knows, YOU might be the one that's wrong, instead of everyone else.
And after you are done deleting the stars, you can move onto 'accepting constructive criticism well' exercises...
- Agreed!– Stian1/3
  i think she's accepting the criticism pretty well, myself– bigtrickagain2/3
  CAPTAIN CONDESCENDING... TO THE RESCUE!!!!– themousewhisperer3/3
You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.
Cancel
Dog-earFeb 9, 10, 6:36 a.m. – Permalink
spraycan
maybe having the gallery on a loop would be cooler.
- I thought about this. Could work nicely. Keep u from just sorta crashing n2 the last frame. Thx!– cassie
You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.
Cancel
Dog-earFeb 9, 10, 7:45 a.m. – Permalink
therapist
if you really don't want to have the stars clickable, you should at least invert the colours on them so that active is pink and inactive is grey. Grey being a more appropriate colour for something that isn't clickable. On that note - why are some of your links grey at rest and pink on hover and some of them the other way around?
- great idea!– cassie
You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.
Cancel
Dog-earFeb 9, 10, 7:53 a.m. – Permalink
cassie
OSFA-
I guess you took my response differently than was intended.
- maybe.– OSFA
You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.
Cancel
Dog-earFeb 9, 10, 8:32 a.m. – Permalink
themousewhisperer
I think the images are great. The designer should shoot himself in the face, tho!
- well, he's a sad designer...– OSFA1/3
  Sad to see the recession is affecting you deeply in OSFAland as well.– themousewhisperer2/3
  Things will pick up. I'm sure of it.– themousewhisperer3/3
You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.
Cancel
Dog-earFeb 9, 10, 9:52 a.m. – Permalink

Login or Register to respond to this

Public Voice Network

stuff I shot 1919 Responses

Login or Register to respond to this