Public Voice Network
- XBMC 11
- the gif animation thread 1282812828
- Letterpress process video
- paper trail 88
- ATTN: Greedy Republicans 88
- Pic of the Day 6329663296
- New York 11
- Facebook IPO 156156
- Vid of the Day 1203212032
- Diablo III 8383
- Coda 2 3434
- Chick of the Day 1537615376
- Euro Crisis 66
- In Dallas for a month 1212
- Show your latest Pics 32933293
- shopped? 66
- Oh Amazon. 22
- blog 5626456264
- pdf portfolio 99
- I can see it in the pixel… 1919
- TransFatty @Brooklyn Bowl 1717
- wot dis font? 11
- News of the day... 135135
- What is THEIR work? 33
Bad Company 2 2727 Responses
Last post: 2 years, 3 months ago | Thread started: Feb 1, 10, 8:15 a.m.
Out of context: Response #6 [Feb 1, 10, 8:15 a.m.]
- BRNK
I've been playing MAG lately and I have to say I like it better than Bad Company. I have BC1 and have played plenty of the BC2 beta. BC does vehicles and buildings better, but the shooting mechanic and overall progression of a match is much better in MAG.
It has huge maps that can feel like seriously frantic warzones and smaller, team-based arenas over the course of a match. It has much more rewarding non-combat classes; medic and engineer classes will get you plenty of XP and are really crucial to the team's success in MAG.
The one drawback of MAG is that it is a slow burn. It does a pretty terrible job of showing you how great a game is until you've spent 5-8 hours playing it. I've never had a more rewarding experience playing a shooter online, not even MW2. Once you gain the ability to apply for a leadership position in a match, you start to see just how strategic the game can be.... or you can just run around and shoot stuff and have fun that way too.MAG may not look or sound pretty, but it'll reward you if you invest some time in it.


- View thread



