Public Voice Network
- paper trail 88
- ATTN: Greedy Republicans 88
- Pic of the Day 6329663296
- the gif animation thread 1282412824
- New York 11
- Facebook IPO 156156
- Vid of the Day 1203212032
- Diablo III 8383
- Coda 2 3434
- Chick of the Day 1537615376
- Euro Crisis 66
- In Dallas for a month 1212
- Show your latest Pics 32933293
- shopped? 66
- Oh Amazon. 22
- blog 5626456264
- pdf portfolio 99
- I can see it in the pixel… 1919
- TransFatty @Brooklyn Bowl 1717
- wot dis font? 11
- News of the day... 135135
- What is THEIR work? 33
- EC: From Love to Bingo 1515
- Car Design(s) 132132
64bit computers 1717 Responses
Last post: 2 years, 4 months ago | Thread started: Dec 29, 09, 8:50 a.m.
- lukus_W
It's no different most of the time ... 64bit means you can use a much larger amount of RAM (4GB+).
All optimisation is very dependent on the type of application (and what kind of processing that application needs to carry out). Although, if yr application benefits from a large amount of RAM you'll probably get better performance, but otherwise I don't really think there's so much in it.
The base concern is that all apps need to be recompiled to work on 64bit. With linux, it's not so difficult - because most applications can be downloaded as source code and recompiled manually. With close-source programs (i.e. Windows) it's not so straightforward, because Microsoft (or Adobe or whoever) have to supply the compiled binary.
I can't really imagine that they'd choose not to, as it seems that 64bit computing is becoming the standard for new PC's.

- Dog-earJan 3, 10, 5:24 a.m. – Permalink
- syedsyahrul
That old school


- Dog-earJan 3, 10, 7:44 a.m. – Permalink


