Public Voice Network
- Diablo III 8383
- the gif animation thread 1282212822
- Coda 2 3434
- Chick of the Day 1537615376
- Pic of the Day 6329563295
- Vid of the Day 1203112031
- ATTN: Greedy Republicans 11
- Euro Crisis 66
- In Dallas for a month 1212
- Show your latest Pics 32933293
- shopped? 66
- Oh Amazon. 22
- blog 5626456264
- pdf portfolio 99
- I can see it in the pixel… 1919
- TransFatty @Brooklyn Bowl 1717
- wot dis font? 11
- News of the day... 135135
- paper trail 77
- What is THEIR work? 33
- EC: From Love to Bingo 1515
- Car Design(s) 132132
- NYC Birthday show this tu… 77
- Sound apps. Hit me. 1212
Moon ladning tapes 3030 Responses
Last post: 2 years, 10 months ago | Thread started: Jul 2, 09, 1:44 p.m.
- robotron3k
Love the premise about Stanley Kubrick + NASA story that is backed up by his wife and production manager


- Dog-earJul 2, 09, 1:58 p.m. – Permalink
- invisiblechamber
»Opération lune«
watched it the other day - great stuff! (robotron3k-post is from this)
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0344…

- Dog-earJul 2, 09, 2:19 p.m. – Permalink
- imnotadesigner
this is the shit right here

- Dog-earJul 2, 09, 2:33 p.m. – Permalink
- duckofrubber


- Dog-earJul 2, 09, 6:19 p.m. – Permalink
- emesstyle
According to the NASA Deputy Assistant Administrator for Public Affairs, the article is inaccurate.
"@tedinbow NASA didn't say the tapes were found. The UK report inaccurately did." - http://twitter.com/bnjacobs/stat…
"If you want to learn more about the telemetry tapes that are the target of the NASA search, check out http://tr.im/qlHT & http://tr.im/qlDu " - http://twitter.com/bnjacobs/stat…
http://twitter.com/bnjacobs
http://www.linkedin.com/in/bnjac…
- Dog-earJul 2, 09, 6:20 p.m. – Permalink
- ukit
Does anyone really believe that human beings have actually set foot on the moon? I don't know, but I believe that if it wasn't for the sci-fi feats of Kubrick in 2001, the American brain trust would have offered us only audio of the so-called moon landing.
It was 2001 that showed NASA how to stage a moon landing.
In fact, in early 1968, Mr. Kubrick was secretly approached by NASA officials who presented him with a lucrative offer to "direct" the first three moon landings.Initially Kubrick declined, as "2001: A Space Odyssey" was in post-production at the time, but NASA sweetened the deal by offering to allow Mr. Kubrick exclusive access to the alien artifacts and autopsy footage from the Roswell crash site.

- Dog-earJul 2, 09, 6:32 p.m. – Permalink
- version3
i think we've been to the moon, we've all seen people die attempting to leave and returning into the atmosphere, why do that? just to entertain a charade? with the amount of money on this planet, i don't see it far fetched at all that some of the greatest minds came together to explore for more, away from this planet.
hell, manufacturing automated processes boggle my mind with the intricacies of each little step to complete an entire task, but just because i can barely comprehend it doesn't mean it hasn't been done for over a century by people smarter than myself

- Dog-earJul 2, 09, 6:37 p.m. – Permalink
- October
which one is harder to believe?
1. an agency with technology that can take people to outer space and back with reliable consistency (which can also be done by another agency from another country at the time) can come up with a way to extend that trip to our planet's moon and do it multiple times.
2. keep everyone involved in a massive conspiracy quiet for decades. all the logistical personnel involved in staging a moon landing, other people involved like the aussies who recorded the footage and the russian goverment.
if the US president cant keep a blowjob in the oval office a secret, how did nasa keep anyone from exposing the hoax?

- Dog-earJul 2, 09, 7:52 p.m. – Permalink






