Public Voice Network
- Vid of the Day 1203112031
- ATTN: Greedy Republicans 11
- Chick of the Day 1537515375
- Euro Crisis 66
- Pic of the Day 6329463294
- Diablo III 8181
- In Dallas for a month 1212
- Show your latest Pics 32933293
- shopped? 66
- Oh Amazon. 22
- blog 5626456264
- pdf portfolio 99
- I can see it in the pixel… 1919
- the gif animation thread 1282112821
- TransFatty @Brooklyn Bowl 1717
- wot dis font? 11
- News of the day... 135135
- Coda 2 3232
- paper trail 77
- What is THEIR work? 33
- EC: From Love to Bingo 1515
- Car Design(s) 132132
- NYC Birthday show this tu… 77
- Sound apps. Hit me. 1212
Shepard Fairey in RS 7878 Responses
Last post: 3 years, 1 month ago | Thread started: Apr 5, 09, 11:26 a.m.
- cannonball
Lol. That asshat deserves to... eh I don't have the strength.


- Dog-earApr 5, 09, 11:29 a.m. – Permalink
- uberdesigner
can they prove that he painted them?


- Dog-earApr 5, 09, 11:35 a.m. – Permalink
- prophet0NE
Just to be clear as per the point of the thread, because he may eventually become the posterboy artiste for the Obama generation, he should be left alone when he retools your work into $$ because doing so will possibly disrupt his creative process and his career? You would buy into that idea if it were your work?
And isn't messing with the bee's nest the point of all of this? He wants to stir up shit and see where it takes him. He has become famous in the process, and a target. God bless him for it.


- Dog-earApr 5, 09, 11:58 a.m. – Permalink
- ukit
I will admit I have trouble feeling too sorry for him...he claims he has the right to do art on public property and "reappropriate" others work, ultimately for his own financial gain. But then when someone does the same to him he sues them. How does that work?

- Dog-earApr 5, 09, 12:34 p.m. – Permalink
- e-pill
i read the initial post. and it is very one sided...
my respose to onenine is until your home is vandalized, without your permission dont complain. i hope he gets it all. he has vandalized his art on my home more than once and everytime it wasnt appreciated. vandalism is not a career as you make it out to be. he gets what he deserves. to me he deserves this in spades.

- Dog-earApr 5, 09, 12:51 p.m. – Permalink
- Horp
I am on the fence with regard to unsolicited art in public places. In my youth I perpetrated such acts and it got me into the line of work I'm in, so its hard for me to condemn it outright. I do think though that his shitty hypocriscy concerning copyright and his contradictory ideas about artistic rights to appropriate have lost him a lot of sympathy and I for one will not feel sorry for him at all if he suffers punishment.
I still think it would be a great time to bait him with some flagrant Obey rips but I lack the enthusiam thanks to a dependency onblack market tranquilisers that threatens to destroy my life any day now.

- Dog-earApr 5, 09, 12:57 p.m. – Permalink
- ukit
The problem with this kind of stuff in general is that the willingness to excuse it is totally subjective.
Is Fairey's work artistic enough to be given a pass? I guess it's well executed, but I have trouble seeing it as art, I view it more as hipster culture commercial design.
Is Banksy's? I guess I could see that as more artistic than Fairey, but who am I to say?
What if some 14 year old spray paints "CUNTFACE" on the side of a building? Is that better or worse? Why does Shep get a pass and the 14 year old not?
Ultimately I guess the best approach is to not get caught/ remain anonymous if you really want to do this kind of stuff and continue to get away with it.

- Dog-earApr 5, 09, 1:08 p.m. – Permalink
- rayborn3000
people are such jealous bitches with nothing better to worry about ... and 87 years? that sounds fair right? ... pardon me while I go work on my own shit

- Dog-earApr 5, 09, 1:35 p.m. – Permalink




