Public Voice Network
- Vid of the Day 1203112031
- ATTN: Greedy Republicans 11
- Chick of the Day 1537515375
- Euro Crisis 66
- Pic of the Day 6329463294
- Diablo III 8181
- In Dallas for a month 1212
- Show your latest Pics 32933293
- shopped? 66
- Oh Amazon. 22
- blog 5626456264
- pdf portfolio 99
- I can see it in the pixel… 1919
- the gif animation thread 1282112821
- TransFatty @Brooklyn Bowl 1717
- wot dis font? 11
- News of the day... 135135
- Coda 2 3232
- paper trail 77
- What is THEIR work? 33
- EC: From Love to Bingo 1515
- Car Design(s) 132132
- NYC Birthday show this tu… 77
- Sound apps. Hit me. 1212
Canon 5d MKII 4444 Responses
Last post: 2 years, 2 months ago | Thread started: Mar 17, 09, 3:16 a.m.
- bolus
I never owned a digital camera in my life (except for the one on my phone) and have no desire to trade in my film based equipment, that said I think the video function of the mark II is quite cool
example:
http://www.vimeo.com/3240991
- Dog-earMar 17, 09, 3:59 a.m. – Permalink
- BannedKappa
I love this camera...Wish i had the dosh to splurge...

- Dog-earMar 17, 09, 3:59 a.m. – Permalink
- invisiblechamber
i'm planning to replace my canon XM2 video cam with a Canon 5d MKII. HD on a SLR is a revolutionary improvement of video picture quality. it's not about the resolution, but the focal depth possibilities - video cameras just do not have them. but i'm not talking from a photographer point of view - more from one who is eager to have a little hollywood quality in moving image :-)

- Dog-earMar 17, 09, 4:16 a.m. – Permalink
- raf
I will upgrade for the fantastic ISO, but not before the prices go down. Right now it is usable up to 1250, Mark II pushes the bar above 3200. It is just about one stop.. now I started thinking if it's worth it.. :)
The only irritating thing is they dumb some features down in order not to cannibalize sales of higher models, just like they did with the original 5D. AF speed/sensitivity hasn't improved, even lower models like 50D are a bit better in this regard.
Continuous shooting speed below 4fps isn't impressive at all, the 20D had 5fps ages ago.But who would buy other cameras if they made 5D perfect, huh?


- Dog-earMar 17, 09, 4:48 a.m. – Permalink
- slappy
I will buy a mkii but I'll also keep my trusty old 5D. The 5D has never been a sports camera and never will be. Its purely a wedding photographers camera with fantastic IQ and sub par speed (AF and FPS). It has a great sensor and a huge image buffer. It takes great pics.

- Dog-earMar 17, 09, 5:56 a.m. – Permalink
- raf
AF sensitivity is a pet peeve of mine. I had 3 Pentax dslrs, kept upgrading with hope for a better AF someday until I had enough and went Canon. Thing is, 5D's AF beats any Pentax hands down, but still is a bit underwhelming.
That's why I got an ST-E2 for my 5D recently. It is an IR transmitter used to launch flashguns wirelessly, but first of all it shoots an infrared beam in front of the camera for AF assistance (like most flashguns do, only withouth the lamp bulk). This way I can lock focus even in total darkness. Did I say it also drives flashguns remotely?


- Dog-earMar 17, 09, 6:38 a.m. – Permalink
- ArmandoEstrada
Got. Love.


- Dog-earMar 17, 09, 12:09 p.m. – Permalink
- version3
From what I've read and seen, the video is tricky and quality results take time and it actually performs better in low light for video, white balancing is always a necessity. I own a 5d mk1 and am quite pleased with it. I Itch for the video function as well however I've also read that it mainly for stationary positioning as panning causes freezing and jerkiness. also it can only shoot for about 12-15 minutes at a time and the sensor actually warms/heats up over that time and should be sufficient rest to cool between "takes".
I though I would buy this as a segue into video for the lens control/options but will likely hold off a bit longer to get a better video camera as I do not see myself needing anything more than this 5D for photography


- Dog-earMar 17, 09, 12:21 p.m. – Permalink




