Public Voice Network
- Pic of the Day 5937859378
- Shit QBNers think 7070
- Ageless Male
- Ageless Male
- Shit QBNers Say 131131
- Ageless Male
- FMT 020312 4747
- Show Yo Dog 2012
- Ageless Male
- Light in the box coupons
- Multicolored logos? 1414
- Politics 1759817598
- blog 5558055580
- Light in the Box Coupons
- Vid of the Day 1096110961
- TYPO San Francisco 55
- Suggest a good movie... 936936
- Logo from Locked PDF? 33
- American Musical Supply C… 11
- intern -> job 2121
- Your Last Concert 375375
- the gif animation thread 1132211322
- Steve Jobs FBI file 66
- What are you listening to… 41734173
Canon 5d MKII 4444 Responses
Last post: 1 year, 11 months ago | Thread started: Mar 17, 09, 3:16 a.m.
- Nightshade
Guess it depends if you need the new features. Do you need the video function, do you need 21mp, do you need high ISOs?
Personally I have the Mk1 and love it. It does everything I need very well, and i'm not paying for any features I don't need. 12.8mp is plenty of me, I had a cropped photo printed as a double page spread and it still looked great.
- Dog-earMar 17, 09, 3:23 a.m. – Permalink
- bolus
I never owned a digital camera in my life (except for the one on my phone) and have no desire to trade in my film based equipment, that said I think the video function of the mark II is quite cool
example:
http://www.vimeo.com/3240991
- Dog-earMar 17, 09, 3:59 a.m. – Permalink
- BannedKappa
I love this camera...Wish i had the dosh to splurge...

- Dog-earMar 17, 09, 3:59 a.m. – Permalink
- invisiblechamber
i'm planning to replace my canon XM2 video cam with a Canon 5d MKII. HD on a SLR is a revolutionary improvement of video picture quality. it's not about the resolution, but the focal depth possibilities - video cameras just do not have them. but i'm not talking from a photographer point of view - more from one who is eager to have a little hollywood quality in moving image :-)

- Dog-earMar 17, 09, 4:16 a.m. – Permalink
- raf
I will upgrade for the fantastic ISO, but not before the prices go down. Right now it is usable up to 1250, Mark II pushes the bar above 3200. It is just about one stop.. now I started thinking if it's worth it.. :)
The only irritating thing is they dumb some features down in order not to cannibalize sales of higher models, just like they did with the original 5D. AF speed/sensitivity hasn't improved, even lower models like 50D are a bit better in this regard.
Continuous shooting speed below 4fps isn't impressive at all, the 20D had 5fps ages ago.But who would buy other cameras if they made 5D perfect, huh?


- Dog-earMar 17, 09, 4:48 a.m. – Permalink
- slappy
I will buy a mkii but I'll also keep my trusty old 5D. The 5D has never been a sports camera and never will be. Its purely a wedding photographers camera with fantastic IQ and sub par speed (AF and FPS). It has a great sensor and a huge image buffer. It takes great pics.

- Dog-earMar 17, 09, 5:56 a.m. – Permalink
- raf
AF sensitivity is a pet peeve of mine. I had 3 Pentax dslrs, kept upgrading with hope for a better AF someday until I had enough and went Canon. Thing is, 5D's AF beats any Pentax hands down, but still is a bit underwhelming.
That's why I got an ST-E2 for my 5D recently. It is an IR transmitter used to launch flashguns wirelessly, but first of all it shoots an infrared beam in front of the camera for AF assistance (like most flashguns do, only withouth the lamp bulk). This way I can lock focus even in total darkness. Did I say it also drives flashguns remotely?


- Dog-earMar 17, 09, 6:38 a.m. – Permalink
- ArmandoEstrada
Got. Love.


- Dog-earMar 17, 09, 12:09 p.m. – Permalink




