Site Crit
- Started
- Last post
- 24 Responses
- brewmanchew
Howdy,
Working on finalizing our new site. Would love some harsh crits or bugginess pointed out.
Thanks!
- moamoa0
toooooo much bling zoom schnik schnak effects.
- canuck0
i'm sure your clients will love it.
- Fuzziest0
Intros of each section seem a bit long.
And is your company name "See Brand Go" Or "D + i" it's not clear.
- fodcj0
What exactly is 'blahg' in the bottom left corner?
- blog playing off the work blahdbloc
- You got it
blah, blah, blahbrewmanchew
- dbloc0
nice work. clean.
- Llyod0
kind of ugly
- Milan0
love it, great job! I wouldn't change a thing
- Fuzziest0
may want to use a Contact form, instead of just a mailto link.
- univers0
Yeah I think it's a great concept and great execution! Good work. I do feel like the slide from left to right after the images load when you click on different projects is a tad slow.
Nice Work!
- brewmanchew0
Thank you for the comments. Actually, our company is D&i, our tagline is "See Brand Go". We added the tagline this year and it has met with some similar confusion.
- ********0
not a fan of the colors but the layout is fresh and the animations are nicey nice.
- the colors aren't horrible i think it's the combination that sours it a bitlongtongued_liar
- that blue should be with a different orange or vice versalongtongued_liar
- mikotondria30
I really like some of your identity work, theres some sweet ones in there :)
- ********0
You are very happy to do claret and blue identity.
- cls0
I don't like the first bit that much, but love the part where the images roll in, that is a nice animation. But the first bit where the logo comes in is a bit to childish for me. Other then that great site.
- ********0
i clicked on identities and couldn't see any. not sure if this is a mistake or not.
- brewmanchew0
Childish is not a bad way to describe it. It's a bit of our personality coming through on what is, overall, a clean presentation.
Thank you for the comments much!
- ********0
the layout is way too busy IMO. there´s a basic lack of structure and coherence, too many stages.
one huge problem is that the design doesn´t seem to differentiate between elements that are eye-candy, and elements that are the hard content of the given page. they all look the same, like one single illustration. the style itself is good, but from a Usability POV it fails. not a good approach for an interactive application.
It´s also unclear what the name of your firm is, like it was mentioned before. there´s obviously something wrong with the prioritisation of the visual elements, since the name of your shop is the most important piece of info that you have to communicate. the
The colours and animations are nice though.
my suggestion would be to drastically simplify the layout of the site and to balance the prominence of the different visual elements according to their given relevance, so that they don´t cancel each other out.
- ********0
I personally don't like it when studio sites show brand work, and neglect to talk about their process for identity synthesis. It really irks me. Logomarks/logotypes are more about a pretty picture, and you should always talk about how your arrived at that pretty picture.
- Interesting point. Please see the "Brand Studies" examples.brewmanchew
- dearhead0
ahhh, so you did the starz rebrand.. we did the starz website. nice to meet you :)