Public Voice Network
- Top Documentary Films 8383
- Pic of the Day 3564835648
- win 7 problem 99
- Windows 7 phone
- paper size defined by dri… 11
- Good photography websites… 1010
- Students and Recent Gradu… 55
- i believe 1212
- Chick of the Day 87498749
- Android tablets 1010
- the gif animation thread 39973997
- Anybody been to Egypt? 77
- FMT 090310 5353
- San Francisco: here we co… 5353
- Earthquake Of The Day 101101
- TIbetan Calligraphy - Tas… 33
- qbning on the toilet taki… 1616
- Logo Designer? 1515
- Hate Mail 1313
- CS5 in the UK - Best valu… 22
- Dropular 1111
- Show some recent work 33753375
- people you will see in he… 8484
- Trailer Of The Day 8787
skip to nav/content 77 Responses
Last post: 1 year, 10 months ago | Thread started: Nov 5, 08, 3:23 a.m.
- Stugoo
I've started a debate.
different styles of build use different techniques to change content
for accesibilty purposes you should generally have a skip to nav and/or skip to content link, so that the user, if using a mobile device or browser without CSS its easy to navigate around the page.there are 2 methods which I have used in the past,
skip to content:
build the page as normal,
<skip to content link>
<header>
<content>
<footer>or
Skip to navigation:absolutley position the header using css and put the most relative content at the top of the page.
<skip to navigation link>
<content>
<footer>
<header>the arguments are that the client branding gets pushed to the bottom of the page or that the most relative content goes to the top.
what do you think?
- Nov 5, 08, 3:23 a.m. – Permalink
- jamble
Good question, I'd never thought of the second way of doing it as I've always put the skip at the top with the header beneath.
I guess the only question about the second method is the need for a skip to content if the content is right at the top, you may be best off just having the content without the skip? Usually the skip is to get you past a header but if the header is at the bottom of the source this probably becomes a little redundant?


- Dog-earNov 5, 08, 3:35 a.m. – Permalink
- trooperbill
dont break the standard, anyway screen readers are a little more spohisticated than they used to be, they read out lists of titles and links so its not liner any more.


- Dog-earNov 5, 08, 3:54 a.m. – Permalink
- WeLoveNoise
its a def a risk - but if u did it well it could look pretty good


- Dog-earNov 5, 08, 3:58 a.m. – Permalink
- studderine
why would someone want to "skip" to navigation and/or content? just wondering.

- Dog-earNov 6, 08, 8:47 a.m. – Permalink




