London 2012
- Started
- Last post
- 33 Responses
- Fariska0
Actually, according to the guidelines, you can't use landscape elements. That's why chicago's bid logo has been redesigned.
- harmsie0
These are terrible, terrible logos goes to show how hard that logo would be to do with out it being cheesy. Current won is fine but not as good as the paralympic logo
- skii0
stinks of london!
- modern0
Horrible attempts in that first link, landmarks, torches (not allowed anyway) and rings (also not allowed) how woefully generic and also failing to understand the limitations of the brief.
- Nairn0
I'm not getting involved in this kind of shit again - if you type my name into Google, the very first bloody result that comes back is my slightly sarccy entry to the bloody BBC London competition held last year, where they edited out half of my sarcasm. Enough to make me sound sincere, anyway. Bastards.
- timfraserbrown0
This is great. Everyone slags it off... No-one can do any better... Not even close.
- Hey now, my one comes pretty damn close - it's purple.Nairn
- gimmie £400,000 and i'll try a little harder...skii
- paypal?timfraserbrown
- accepted. £200,000 advance, rest on completionskii
- ... in three yearsskii
- KennyRodger0
Should just let it go, logo sucks, nextttt
- mistermik0
why does it suck - can understand people not liking it but no-one has giving a reason (apart from instant visual mumbojumbo)
- agreed.timfraserbrown
- the only reason i hate is that it's an 80's fad logoskii
- moamoa0
- I believe, despite any ensuing boo’s, that this is some of the most innovative and daring identity work we have seen in this new millennium, and the lack of cheesy and imagination-impairin... gradients gives me hope that identity work can still be resurrected on a larger scale.mistermik
- yeah and more... he actually beginas to like the ident towards the end of article.mistermik
- my problem is also the 80"s look,moamoa
- mistermik0
2 good articles.


