Public Voice Network
- Medium Format 306306
- design works vs. carl dek… 55
- blog 3121131211
- CS4 Question 66
- Got a blind date tonight… 2020
- EC: Shoe at Rush Hour 55
- FMT 120508 2626
- flash question 77
- Quick Survey for Philosop… 2020
- Trapped in Elevator 99
- Official 2008-09 NHL Thre… 112112
- you must know! 55
- Pic of the Day 1049510495
- rippity rip 5959
- QBN Mugs '08 475475
- Politics 50605060
- piece 1010
- Typeface 77
- Copy Font 77
- Simple, classy, handwritt… 1414
- You Suck... 22
- QBN Drinks - Birmingham 1212
- Eurobest 2008 11
- New YouTube player 1212
camera question (or two) 2121 Responses
Last post: 2 months, 3 weeks ago | Thread started: Sep 6, 08, 10:55 p.m.
- Fungal_Bum
I have just been given the chance to buy a Canon 350D with lenses from my Dad. It's definitely more than my budget ($0). Is it worth making some sacrifices for the next 6 months to get this camera for around a grand?
Pros and cons?
Thanks in advance.
- Sep 6, 08, 10:55 p.m. – Permalink
- Fungal_Bum
I think it's the lens kit that came with it when they were first available. I guess I just want to make sure it isn't just some poor cousin of a REAL DSLR. Where is it in relation to the 50D?


- Dog-earSep 6, 08, 11:09 p.m. – Permalink
- ismith
I wouldn't do it. I think it would be a much better investment to research for a new one that fits your eventual budget and then find the exact lenses that suit you. Like dinky said, it's an older camera and depending on how long you plan to be using it (and what for) it may not be right for you. Have you looked at other new cameras, or are you only thinking about it because the offer came up?


- Dog-earSep 6, 08, 11:18 p.m. – Permalink
- Fungal_Bum
Well, a new one is out of the question, and I am not after the "latest and greatest", so is there anything that I would be missing out on by getting something that isn't nearly 3 years old? Apart from megapixels which I don't really care about?


- Dog-earSep 6, 08, 11:20 p.m. – Permalink
- omgitsacamera
50% Experience
25% Body
25% Glass
- Dog-earSep 6, 08, 11:25 p.m. – Permalink
- Fungal_Bum
$700 Australian, to quote the figure he mentioned today.

- Dog-earSep 6, 08, 11:26 p.m. – Permalink
- forcetwelve
i'd get a 400D over a 350D


- Dog-earSep 7, 08, 2:37 a.m. – Permalink
- jamble
I've got a 350d, as jacobdean said above, it's an entry level camera but it is a very solid one which does a good job.
The kit lens isn't great but you can pick up decent lenses to use with it. I guess it depends how badly you need a camera now really. It's certainly not a bad camera by any stretch and offers a decent range of features for a "cheap" option.


- Dog-earSep 7, 08, 2:41 a.m. – Permalink
- Fungal_Bum
Well, since I wouldn't be using it professionally, it doesn't make sense for me to get a pro camera. I am currently using a fixed lense 4 megapixel camera with no manual exposure, so I think this one will do me unless things get serious. I think I am doing OK with it, but I am geeling its limitations I don't get many flickr comments, so maybe I suck BALLS!
Thanks for all the advice. It has been very helpful.

- Dog-earSep 7, 08, 2:53 a.m. – Permalink
- Laurent
350D not recent but:
1. Surely yr dad looked after it
2. As long as it is in good condition buy it
3. If you already struggling for the budget, buy it cheap from your dad
4. it all depends on which level of photos u r interested in > it will do the job as long as the lens and sensor are clean.
5. Put money on a new lens as the 18-55 is slightly poor
6. You could buy a new model every 6 months...so....up to you...

- Dog-earSep 7, 08, 3:28 a.m. – Permalink
- 23kon
why not sell the camera on ebay for a decent price then put that money towards a new camera. your dad might be up for loaning you the extra money towards a new and better camera. worth asking.
if it is a camera that is a few years old, then i'd do some research into how good the camera actually was back in the day and compared to other cameras these days.
if it was a really expensive DSLR from a few years ago then chances are it'll still be pretty good specifications, however if its inbetween a compact camera and something pro then chances are its not even going to match up to the likes of todays £150 compact cameras with their good lenses, sensors and megapixels.

- Dog-earSep 7, 08, 7:17 a.m. – Permalink


