Politics
- Started
- Last post
- 33,457 Responses
- TheBlueOne0
I remember when Ted Kennedy kicked the bucket and Breitbart bent over backwards to call the guy a prick and a pile of human excrement.
Loving how all these conservative douchebags are saying "oh look at the hate from the libtards at a human's passing! the horror!"
Karma's a bitch, ain't it.
- uuuuuu0
Does google collect and exploit all the data from sites with google analytics like they do with emails and searches?
- waterhouse0
I have confidentially received a pic of Breitbart's shriveled decomposing penis on my smart phone.
I'll be on Opie & Anthony tomorrow morning to discuss.
- whhipped0
Inside Foxconn: You Will Think Differently About Apple Products
- PonyBoy0
SILLY conspiracy theorists from the 'right' have been yammering on today that Breitbart's death is... murder...
Breitbart was about to release some videos that are supposedly enough to demolish Obama reelection hopes...
Michael Savage (entertaining but nuttier than Ron Paul) has been losing his shit over this the last 2 hours... screaming 'murder' and damn near blaming the administration simply due to Obama's relationship with Bill Ayers (and the like)...
I was sitting here laughing all day long at these silly murder allegations... then about 45 mins ago - Rush Limbaugh called the bomb squad to his home:
http://www.foxnews.com/us/2012/0…... holy shit... they're killing Righty!!
- 2 minutes reading conservative sites and it's like Breitbart was the rightwing Gandhi...TheBlueOne
- ...like America lost a great hero today or something. Unreal.TheBlueOne
- Dude was a racist, button-pushing toady for the oligarchy.TheBlueOne
- qoob0
- qoob0
- zaq0
A bill passed Monday in the US House of Representatives and Thursday in the Senate would make it a felony—a serious criminal offense punishable by lengthy terms of incarceration—to participate in many forms of protest associated with the Occupy Wall Street protests of last year. Several commentators have dubbed it the “anti-Occupy” law, but its implications are far broader.
.. while only Ron Paul and two other Republicans voted against the bill in the House of Representatives (the bill passed 388-3). Not a single Democratic politician voted against the bill.
.. The virtually unanimous passage of H.R. 347 starkly exposes the fact that, despite all the posturing, the Democrats and the Republicans stand shoulder to shoulder with the corporate and financial oligarchy..
- Should come in handy with the G8 and NATO summits coming up in Chicago this May.mg33
- GeorgesII0
Every two or three month,
I drop in this thread then realize how much it's full of shit,
literally,
see you in 3,
- kgvs720
Please vote for this http://wh.gov/XBI
- slepeover0
Kudos.
- colin_s0
zaq mentioned it a few posts up, but the precedents set by HR 347 (which has been passed by both house and senate) are pretty terrifying. you can read the final bill here:
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/qu…
basically it makes protests going on around big government events (g8 / dnc / rnc) illegal, not to mention punishable by up to a year in prison
- whhipped0
- Must be the infamous JazXObama2012
- have no idea what you are talking about, but I get it... put a label on an opposing view so you dont have to comprehend it.whhipped
- it...whhipped
- If it Looks Like a Duck,
Walks Like A Duck,
Sounds Like a Duck...utopian - It shits like a Duck?whhipped
- Hi Alex! Welcome back!DrBombay
- whhipped0
- her thoughts may have some validity if we were starting from scratch, but we are notlocustsloth
- left unregulated, those with money would steamroll over anyone who gets in their way. They do that now WITH regulations in placelocustsloth
- regulations in place. she wanted survival of the fittest, but that rarely results in survival of most kindlocustsloth
- i also think it's funny how modern conservatives love her economic ideals, but seem to glance over her support of separation of church & statelocustsloth
- church and statelocustsloth
- so you're saying that since we have began to go down the wrong path, its too late to do anything... doomed?whhipped
- i'm saying if the laissez-faire approach were enacted now, yes, we would be doomedlocustsloth
- Since we are not at a point where laissez-faire would work, we need to figure out something elselocustsloth
- too bad people (& mostly, politicians) have given up trying to find a moderate pathlocustsloth
- everything has to be a power struggle, a tug of war. It gets us nowherelocustsloth
- Nice... I like you thinking.whhipped
- *yourwhhipped
