Public Voice Network
- Friday, fuck yeah 33
- Wanda Sykes munches rug 1414
- EC: Joe Wigdahl 2323
- Volume One 1010
- Pic of the Day 1017510175
- How much % of visitors to… 2727
- my identity is loading... 44
- Folio Crit 239239
- that jquery, 3838
- NT Blackbook Vol.1 1414
- Google - Promote & Re… 77
- logo crit 4545
- Baby P's Parents/Kill… 5555
- Vid of the Day 492492
- Your Christmas List 2424
- Secret Santa Gift Ideas 1313
- Looking for Flash tutoria… 44
- Arrested Development Movi… 3232
- New XBox Live 4646
- EC: Quarter Pounder 77
- blog 3025230252
- Jaline 103103
- Chick of the Day 16001600
- Portfolio online 1616
jag 88 Responses
Last post: 2 months, 3 weeks ago | Thread started: Aug 28, 08, 12:03 p.m.
- invisiblechamber
was a little piece of pixel based picture manipulation software under mac os 7.6 back in the middle 90s. i used it because it did one thing photoshop never did: perfect anti-aliasing to jagged graphics as a post-process. does anyone know anything that would do this nowadays?
- Aug 28, 08, 12:03 p.m. – Permalink
- invisiblechamber


- Dog-earAug 28, 08, 12:16 p.m. – Permalink
- invisiblechamber


- Dog-earAug 28, 08, 12:19 p.m. – Permalink
- Koopsy
I'm guessing its more complicated than the diagram you've posted, but for the record, to get rid of the jags on an image like that circle (assuming ts not possible to just re-draw the circle) I would do a series of low impact soft gaussian blurs on it, then using either levels or brightness/contrast to re-establish the harder edges.
Doing it that way takes a bit of patience becuase if you lurch straight into one single harsh gaussian blur you'll lose the integrity of the shape, so it has to be maybe ten or more blurs at a few pixels maximum, intersperced with correcting contrast adjustments.
Obviously that doesn;t work with anything that contains tone or textured detail, which was why I asked if I could see the article.


- Dog-earAug 28, 08, 12:19 p.m. – Permalink
- Koopsy
The other thing I sometimes do is multiply the size of something up by fours plus 10 or 20%, so either 410%, 810%, 1610% or 3210% if you've got enough HD room to sample up your file that big, then just sample it back down to its original size. The extra 10% breaks up hard definition so that when you reduce the size back down to where it was to begin with, its anti-aliased itself.
Takes an attemot or two before you figure out which emlargement and which extra 10 or 20% to add to be the most effectve for your image, but it works a treat.

- Dog-earAug 28, 08, 12:35 p.m. – Permalink




