Public Voice Network
- Chick of the Day 1537115371
- the gif animation thread 1282112821
- pdf portfolio 77
- I can see it in the pixel… 1818
- Vid of the Day 1203012030
- Euro Crisis 55
- shopped? 55
- TransFatty @Brooklyn Bowl 1717
- wot dis font? 11
- Pic of the Day 6329063290
- News of the day... 135135
- Coda 2 3232
- paper trail 77
- What is THEIR work? 33
- EC: From Love to Bingo 1515
- Car Design(s) 132132
- NYC Birthday show this tu… 77
- Sound apps. Hit me. 1212
- Dark Knight Rises 575575
- In Dallas for a month 99
- Video Cameras Under $2000 66
- stock music 55
- Diablo III 7979
- Random Fascinations? 22
Global Warming? 223223 Responses
Last post: 1 year, 5 months ago | Thread started: Aug 11, 08, 9:44 a.m.
- JamalJenkins
2012


- Dog-earAug 11, 08, 9:49 a.m. – Permalink
- MashPotatoesJohnson
LOLZ
Manbearpig is real. Im cereal.


- Dog-earAug 11, 08, 10:13 a.m. – Permalink
- lowimpakt
go into the lists of names. Select a few and do a google search on them.
I picked a few at random from the E section.
"Lawrence Thornton Eby, PhD" only two link both to petition sites
"Joseph A. Ellerbrock" only one link which is that petition site
"John G. Esock 3rd" only one link which is that petition site
there is a "Harmon Edwin Eveland, PhD" and a "H. E. Eveland, PhD" I'm assuming they are the same person but only have 4 google links and no apparent publications
"Charles P. Etling" again no publications and the top link of 4 is the petition site.
basically this list is complete bullshit from top to bottom.

- Dog-earAug 11, 08, 10:17 a.m. – Permalink
- mikotondria3
I would then, be interested to hear your explaination of why global temperature trends mirror those of the sun over the last million years and do no correlate with the increased use of hydrocarbons.
Or why temperature rises PREdate an increase in atmospheric C02 by about 800 years every time a warming cycle takes place ?
Seriously...

- Dog-earAug 11, 08, 10:23 a.m. – Permalink
- lowimpakt
Designbot - what is your definition of logic? clutching at bogus internet straws? incapacity to even check is something is valid before trying to pass it off to others?
i could waste another 20 minutes searching through the list and I'm sure it will be the same.
I'm only half way through my PhD and if you search my name in google you get plenty of publications and presentations.... ;)


- Dog-earAug 11, 08, 10:26 a.m. – Permalink
- scrap_paper
There are always going to be arguments for and agianst the point that our actions have harmfully altered our planets climate.
Before jumping on one bandwagon or the other it is important to take a look at who you are reading and who is sponsoring their research.
There are plenty of "scientists" that refute the CO2/climate change connection whose funding is traced back to oil companies. Dependable? I'm not sure.


- Dog-earAug 11, 08, 10:30 a.m. – Permalink
- designbot
It pisses me off that there is so much one-sided propaganda on this issue. At the very least I want people to see the other side. The one who is predominantly responsible for "shedding light on the issue" of Global Warming has cried wolf before on the "Hole in the ozone". Even after NASA relinquished it's scientific claim that Gore based his argument on.


- Dog-earAug 11, 08, 10:35 a.m. – Permalink














